Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:02:25.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Haitong Project: Exploring a collaborative approach to implement TBLT in primary classrooms in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Yan Zhu
Affiliation:
College of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Fudan [email protected]
Dingfang Shu
Affiliation:
The Shanghai Centre for Research in English Language Education, Shanghai International Studies [email protected]

Extract

As one of the two ‘educational special zones’ in China, Shanghai is launching a new round of curriculum reforms centring on lide shuren, viz. ‘fostering integrity and promoting rounded development of people’ (Hu 2012). Apart from piloting a new plan for Gaokao, the national college entrance examination in 2014, a ground-breaking endeavour by the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission was to establish 17 key research centres at higher institutions for 16 basic education subjects in an effort to push forward city-wide curriculum innovations through in-depth university-school collaborations. Founded in 2016, the Shanghai Centre for Research in English Language Education (SCRELE) is one of these key research platforms.

Type
Research in the News
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beretta, A. (1990). Implementation of the Bangalore project. Applied Linguistics 11, 321337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly 38.4, 639662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2012). TBLT in ELT settings: Looking back and moving forward. In Shehadeh, A. & Coombe, C. (eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 345358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. & Zhao, S.. (2016). On students’ key competency in English as a foreign language. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method [课程·教材·教法], 36 (5): 7986.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
English (Oxford Shanghai edition) 2011. Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. S. C. (2000). English teacher development: Top-down, bottom-up or both? Teaching & Learning 21.1, 2735.Google Scholar
Hu, J. (2012). Report at 18th Party Congress. Retrieved from http://language.chinadaily.com.cn/news/2012-11/19/content_15941774_8.htm Google Scholar
Norris, J., Bygate, M. & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Task-based language assessment. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. (eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 431434.Google Scholar
OECD (2006). Definition and selection of competencies (DeSeCo). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/definitionandselectionofcompetenciesdeseco.htm Google Scholar
Pan, H. (2013). EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching at primary schools in Shanghai. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar
Prahbu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shanghai Curriculum Reform Committee (2004). The English curriculum for primary and secondary schools in Shanghai. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, X. & Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research 18.2, 205221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Shu, D. (2017a). Investigating teachers’ beliefs and teacher-led discourse in task-based language teaching. Modern Foreign Languages [现代外语]40.1, 125136.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Shu, D. (2017b). Implementing foreign language curriculum innovation in a Chinese secondary school: An ethnographic study on teacher cognition and classroom practices. System 66, 100112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar