Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:32:03.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Focus on form and corrective feedback research at the University of Victoria, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2018

Sibo Chen  and
Hossein Nassaji
Sibo Chen
Affiliation:
School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, [email protected]
Hossein Nassaji
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Department of Linguistics at University of Victoria (UVic) in Canada has a long-standing tradition of empirical approaches to the study of theoretical and applied linguistics. As part of the Faculty of Humanities, the department caters to students with a wide range of backgrounds and interests, and provides crucial language teaching support in collaboration with other teaching units at UVic. Accordingly, some applied linguistics studies concern language teaching and learning, some of which are conducted in classroom settings. In this article, we provide a brief overview of recent corrective feedback research conducted by UVic Applied Linguistics Research Group.

Type
Research in the News
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 278 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Rubai'ey, F. & Nassaji, H. (2013). Direct and indirect metalinguistic feedback: A matter of suitability rather than superiority . In Mahmoud, M. & Al Mahrooqi, R. (eds.), Issues in TEFL in the Arab World. Muscat, Oman: Sultan Qaboos University Press, 203–232.Google Scholar
Amrhein, H. R. & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 13.2, 95–127.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2005). Interactional feedback and ESL question development. M.A. Thesis, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (in progress). The effect of mobile-assisted feedback on enhancing learners’ motivation and the accuracy of L2 production. M.A. Thesis, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Nassaji, H. & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 1, item 5.Google Scholar
Fu, T. & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6.1, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, L. & Nassaji, H. (2016). The role of extensive recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6.1, 19–41.Google Scholar
Karim, K. & Nassaji, H. (2015). ESL students’ perceptions of written corrective feedback: What type of feedback do they prefer and why? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 4.1, 5–25.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Nassaji, H. (2017). Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion. Language Teaching Research, online first edition.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 57.4, 511–548.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning 59.2, 411–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2011a). Immediate learner repair and its relationship with learning targeted forms. System 39.1, 17–29.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2011b). Correcting student's written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus non-negotiated feedback. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 1.3, 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2013). Participation structure and incidental focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. Language Learning 63.4, 835–869.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2015a). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2015b). The role of classroom discourse in the use and effectiveness of incidental focus on form. EUROSLA. Aix-en-Provence, France, August, 2015.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research 20.4, 535–562.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017a). Negotiated oral feedback in response to written errors. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017b). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. Modern Language Journal 101.2, 353–368.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (forthcoming). The effects of recasts versus prompts on learning a complex target structure. In DeKeyser, R. & Botana, G. P. (eds.), (Doing) SLA research with implications for the classroom. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.) (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 9.1, 34–51.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21.3, 376–406.Google Scholar
Rahimi, M., Kushki, A. & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory 2.2, 185–208.Google Scholar
Ross, Z. (2014). World of Warcraft as a medium for intermediate-level English language acquisition: Leveling up accuracy, fluency, and lexical complexity. M.A. Thesis, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Sinha, T. S. (2017). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving ESL learners’ grammatical accuracy. M.A. Thesis, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Yousefi, M. (2017). The effect of instruction on learning L2 pragmatics: A meta-analysis. Ph.D. candidacy paper, University of Victoria.Google Scholar