Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:58:35.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining second language vocabulary growth: Replications of Schmitt (1998) and Webb & Chang (2012)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Ana Pellicer-Sánchez
Ana Pellicer-Sánchez*
Affiliation:
University College London Institute of Education, London, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been extensive research in the last 20 years on the effectiveness of different instructional interventions and learning conditions on the acquisition of vocabulary. However, very few attempts have been made to explore how vocabulary knowledge develops over time. This paper argues for the need to conduct more longitudinal studies on vocabulary learning and teaching and provides suggestions for important replication studies in the area. In particular, this paper calls for the replication of the studies by Schmitt (1998) and Webb & Chang (2012). Unlike most studies on vocabulary learning and teaching, these two follow a longitudinal approach and study vocabulary growth from two main perspectives, i.e. the development of vocabulary depth and vocabulary breadth. The approximate replications suggested here would constitute an important contribution to the field of vocabulary learning and teaching.

Type
Replication Research
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 512 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C. & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. (ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 77–117.Google Scholar
Avila, E. & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning 46.3, 379–395.Google Scholar
Bell, H. (2009). The messy little details: A longitudinal case study of the emerging lexicon. In Fitzpatrick, T. & Barfield, A. (eds.), Lexical processing in second language learners. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 111–127.Google Scholar
Churchill, E. (2008). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: From ecology to form relations. Applied Linguistics 29.3, 339–358.Google Scholar
Clark, M. K. & Ishida, S. (2005). Vocabulary knowledge differences between placed and promoted EAP students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4.3, 225–238.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. & Horst, M. (2001). Reading academic English: Carrying learners across the lexical threshold. In Flowerdew, J. & Peacock, M. (eds.), The English for academic purposes curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–329.Google Scholar
Costa, F. (2012). Focus on form in ICLHE lectures in Italy: Evidence from English-medium science lectures by native speakers of Italian. AILA Review 25, 30–47.Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y. & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes 33, 66–76.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012). First European survey on language competences.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2012). Tracking the changes: Vocabulary acquisition in the study abroad context. The Language Learning Journal 40.1, 81–98.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Garnier, M. & Schmitt, N. (2014). The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research 19.6, 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559798.Google Scholar
González-Fernández, B. & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166.1, 94–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer .Google Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, P. & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics 11.4, 341–363.Google Scholar
Huckin, T., Haynes, M. & Coady, J. (1993). Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B. (2008). Declarative lexical knowledge. In Albrechtsen, D., Haastrup, K. & Henriksen, B. (eds.), Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 22–66.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16, 36–55.Google Scholar
Lindgren, E. & Muñoz, C. (2013). The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism 10.1, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679275.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2006). Language Lite: Learning French vocabulary in school. Journal of French Language Studies 16, 187–205.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2008). French vocabulary breadth among learners in the British school and university system: comparing knowledge over time. French Language Studies 18, 333–348. doi:10.1017/S0959269508003487.Google Scholar
Milton, J. & Fitzpatrick, T. (2014). Introduction: Deconstructing vocabulary knowledge. In Milton, J. & Fitzpatrick, T. (eds.), Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–13.Google Scholar
Milton, J. & Meara, P. (1995). How periods abroad affect vocabulary growth in a foreign language. ITL International Review of Applied Linguistics 107/108, 17–34.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Diakidoy, I. N. & Anderson, R. C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior 25.2, 155–170.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63.1, 59–82.Google Scholar
Nation, P. & Gu, P. Y. (2007). Focus on vocabulary. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analysing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Nurweni, A. & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes 18.2, 161–175.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (in press). Learning single words vs. learning multiword units. In Webb, S. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169.1, 142–168.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2007). The need for focus on form in content and language integrated approaches: An exploratory study. In Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., de Alba, V. & Moore, P. (eds.), Models and practices in CLIL. Revista Española de lingüística aplicada (RESLA). Logroño: Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 39–53.Google Scholar
Pigada, M. & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language 18.1, 1–28.Google Scholar
Porte, G. K. & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly 10, 77–89.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: Longitudinal study. Language Learning 48.2, 281–317.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2004). Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 17–36.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. & Redwood, S. (2011). Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs. A corpus-informed study. In Meunier, F., De Cock, S., Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. (eds.), A taste for corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 173–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch .Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing 18.1, 55–88.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2019). Formulaic language: Setting the scene. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. London: Routledge, 1–17.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 33–52.Google Scholar
Webb, S. & Chang, A. (2012). Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal 43.1, 113–128.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xue, G. & Nation, P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication 3.2, 215–229.Google Scholar