Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:10:18.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Categories of Situational Context from the Perspective of Stylistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Nils Erik Enkvist
Nils Erik Enkvist
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi, Åbo, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 13 , Issue 1-2 , January 1980 , pp. 75 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 55–9.Google Scholar
Also in Layer, & Hutcheson, (1972), 64–70.Google Scholar
Ahlgren, P. (1978). Tilltalsordet ni. Dess semantik och användning i historiskt perspektiv. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Allwood, J. (1976). Linguistic communication as action and cooperation. A study in pragmatics. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 2. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Amonosova, N. N. (1968). Anglijskaja kontekstologija. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Arndt, H. (1978). Deterrninanten sprachlicher Interaktion: Gruppen - und Interaktionstypen. Die neueren Sprachen, 77. 27 Neule Folge, 300–25.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variation in linguistic theory. Washington: Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, C..J. N. (1974). Contributions of the study of variation to the framework of the new linguistics. Linguistische Berichte, 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (1973). New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, San Francisco & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Benigni, L. (1975). Rules of address in Italy: a sociological survey. Language in Society, 4, 271–88.Google Scholar
Bayer, K. (1977). Sprechen und Situation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Beneš, E. & Vachek, J. (eds.) (1971). Stilistik und Soziolinguistik. Beiträge der Prager Schule zur strukturellen Sprachbetrachtung und Spracherziehung. Munich: List.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971–1973). Class, codes and control, I-II. Primary Socialization, Language and Education, IV. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1975–1977). Introduction to systemic linguistics, I-II. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). The chimaera of context. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 5/6, 1–21.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1973). Kinesics and context. Essays on body-motion communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1975). Language (revised ed.).London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M. & de, Haan D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: on the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of powerand solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A (1960), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 253–76.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. P. (1960). Vectors of prose style. In Sebeok, T. A. (1960), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 283–92.Google Scholar
Cole, P. (ed.) (1978). Syntax and semantics, 9. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) (1975). Syntax and semantics, 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1955–1956). Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas da una lingüistica del hablar. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 7, 29–54. Reprinted in Coseriu (1962), 282–323.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1962). Teoria del lenguaje y lingüistica general. Biblioteca romámica hispánica, 11. Estudios y essayos 61. Madrid.Google Scholar
Crosby, F. & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 313–22.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Quirk, C. R. (1964). Systems of prosodic and paralinguistic features in English. Janua Linguarum series minor, 39. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
van, Dijk T. A. (1977 a). Text and context: some explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
van, Dijk T. A. (1977 b). Context and cognition: knowledge frames and speech act comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 211–32.Google Scholar
van, Dijk T. A. (ed.) (1976). Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dubský, J. (1972). The Prague conception of functional style. In Fried (1972), 112–27.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. & Todorov, T. (1972). Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1979). Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society, 8, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. (1968). Meaning and context: an exercise in practical stylistics. English Language Teaching, 22, 272–7.Google Scholar
Elllegard, A. (1962). A statistical method for determining authorship. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1964). On defining style. In Enkvist et al. (1964), 3–56.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E., Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. (1964). Linguistics and style. Language and Language Learning, 6. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1973). Linguistic stylistics. Janua Linguarum series critica 5. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society, 5, 137–51.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1968). Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fleischer, W. (1970). Grundfragen der Stilklassifikation unter funktionalen Aspekt. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Pädagogischen Hochschule ‘Dr Theodor Neubauer’ Erfurt Mühlhausen. Gesellschaft- und spachwissenschaftliche Reihe 7, 2, 23–28.Google Scholar
Freihoff, R. & Takala, S. (1974). Kielenkäyttötilanteiden esittelyyn perustuva kielenopetuksen tavoitekuvausjärjestelmä. [A system of goal description for language teaching based on presentations of situations of language use.] Reports from the Language Centre, University of Jyväskylä, number 2, separate English summary in number 3, German summary in number 4.Google Scholar
Fried, V. (1972). The Prague School of linguistics and language teaching. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. (1972). Social context and semantic feature: the Russian pronominal usage. In Gumperz & Hymes (1972), 270–300.Google Scholar
Gal'perin, I. R. (1971). Stylistics. Moscow: Higher School Publishing House.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Sir A. H. (1932). The theory of speech and language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1968). Linguistic etiquette. In Fishman (1968), 282–95.Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. P. (ed.) (1972). Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gläser, R. (1969). Linguistische Kriterien der Stilbeschreibung. Typescript of Habilitationsschrift, Leipzig: Karl-Marx-Universität, Sektion Theoretische und angewandte Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (ed). (1978). Questions of politeness. Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177–98.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. & Carroll, S. (1978). Language and situation. Language varieties and their social contexts. London, etc.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole & Morgan (1975), 41–58.Google Scholar
Grimes, J. (1975). The thread of discourse. Janua Linguarum Series minor 207. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, etc.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). System and function in language: selected papers. Kress, G., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1966). Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlaeggetse. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Holcroft, D. (1978). Words and deeds. Problems in the theory of speech acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1964). Language in culture and society. A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1977). Foundations in sociolinguistics. An ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Johannisson, T. (1973). Ett sprakligt signalement. English summary: ‘A linguistic signalement’. Nordistica Gothoburgensia 6. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Gothenburg: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (1962). The five clocks. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kirstein, B. (1975). Toward a situational grammar. Linguistische Berichte, 39, 28–38.Google Scholar
Kitaxova, Z. Ju & Kitaxov, K. (1978). Problemy klassifikacij funtcional'nyx stilej v jazykax različnyx tipov. [On the problem of classifying functional styles in languages of different types.] Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1, 3–17.Google Scholar
Kolšanskij, G. V. (1959). O prirode konteksta. [About the nature of context.] Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 47–9.Google Scholar
Kožina, M. (1968). K osnovanijam functional'noj stilistiki. [Towards the foundations of functional stylistics.] Perm': Universitet im. A.M. Gor'kogo.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
Also in Giglioli, (1972), 283–308 and in Pride & Holmes (1972), 180–202.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The isolation of contextual styles. In Labov, (1972), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 45–80.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E. & Tucker, G. R. (1976). Tu, vous, usted: a social-psychological study of address patterns. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T. (1968). The London School of linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Layer, J. & Hutcheson, S. (eds.) (1972). Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Leodolter, R. (1975). Die Kategorie der ‘Sprechsituation’: Zur soziolinguistischen Theoriebildung (Zusammenfassung). Grazer Linguistische Studien, 1, 142–49.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (ed.) (1978). Action, gesture and symbol. The emergence of language. London, New York and San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, R. E. (1976). An anatomy of speech notions. Amsterdam: de Ridder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, W. F. (1978). Pragmalinguistica in context. Die neueren Sprachen, 77.27 Neue Folge, 194–223.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (ed.) (1978). The social context of language. Chichester and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1975). Principles of Firthian linguistics. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. L. (1970). Quantitative analysis of writing styles. Journal of Linguistics, 6, 223–30.Google Scholar
Moles, A. A. & Rohmer, E. (1977). Théorie des actes. Vers une écologic des actions. Tournai: Casterman.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F. & Wallace, D. L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: the federalist papers. Reading, Mass.: Addison & Wesley.Google Scholar
Müller, R. M. (1970). Situation und Lehrbuchtexte: die Kontextualisierbarkeitsprobe. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 17, 3, 229–42.Google Scholar
Müller, R. M. (1971). Was ist ‘situational teaching’: em Vorschlag zur Systematiaierung. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 18, 229–39.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, B. (1970). An analysis of prose style to determine authorship. “The O'Ruddy”, a novel by Stephen Crane and Robert Barr. Studies in General and Comparative Literature, IV. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Okaaar, E. (1974). Sprache und Denken. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 1, 317–30.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. A., Suci, G. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Paulston, C. B. (1975). Language and social class: pronouns of address in Swedish. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, 29, 1–19.Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Janus Linguarum series maior, 24. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds.) (1972). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rasper, Chr., Rudigkeit, R., Schäfer, G. & Wenner, D. (1978). Die Beziehung zwischen Turn-Taking Verhalten und sozialem Rang. Linguistische Berichte, 56, 1–22.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. (1971). Essais de stylistique structurale. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Rozkovcová, L. (1973). On theories of Context in linguistics. Philologia Pragensia, 16, 94–106.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1975). A simplest systematics for turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1974). Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Šajkevič, A. Ja (1968). Opyt statističeskogo vydelenija funkcional'nyx stilej. [An attempt at statistical determination of functional styles.] Voprosy jazykoznanja, 1, 64–76.Google Scholar
Sandig, B. (1970). Probleme einer linguistischen Stilistik. Linguistik und Didaktik, 1, 3, 177–94.Google Scholar
Sandig, B. (1978). Stilistik. Sprachpragmatische Grundlegung der Stilbeschreibung. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (ed.) (1978). Linguistic variation. Models and methods. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaar, C. (1978). Linear sequence, spatial structure, complex sign, and vertical context system. Poetics, 7, 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.Google Scholar
Scherfer, P. (1976). Über funktionale Varietäten des Französischen. Linguistische Berichte, 46, 1–15.Google Scholar
Searle, J. A. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. A. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–23.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (1978). The cultural context of communication studies: theoretical and methodological issues.Google Scholar
In Lock, (1978), 43–78.Google Scholar
Sievert, H.-J. (1976). Zum Gebrauch von Anredeformen: Gruss- und Verabschiedungsformeln in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart in der DDR. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 13, 297–300.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1961). Langage et contexte. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1967). Sur lea rapports entre la stylistique et la psycholinguistique. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 12, 4, 309–30.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1977). Convergent and divergent aspects of psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics. In Uribe-Villegas (1977), 169–95.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. (1964). An approach to the study of style.Google Scholar
In Enkvist, et al. (1964), 59–105.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1970). Pragmatics. Synthese, 22, 272–89.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. (1968). The Evans statements. A case for forensic linguistics. Gothenburg Studies in English 20. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. V. (1975). A schema for the contextual study of language. Linguistics, 164, 45–61.Google Scholar
Trojan, F. (1952). Der Ausdruck der Sprachstimme. Vienna and Düsseldorf: Maudrich.Google Scholar
Trojanskaja, E. S. (1979). Aktual'nye problemy issledovanija funkcional'nyx stilej. [Topical problems in the study of functional styles.] InCvilling, M. Ja. et al. (eds.), Lingvostilističeskie issledovanija naučnoj reči. Moscow: lzdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Ure, J. (1969). Practical registers. English Language Teaching, 23, 107–14 and 206–15.Google Scholar
Ure, J. & Ellis, J. (1977). Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. In Uribe-Villegas (1977), 197–243.Google Scholar
Uribe-Villegas, O. (ed.) (1977). Issues in sociolinguistics: contributions to the sociology of language. The Hague, Paris and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. & Dubský, J. (1966). Dictionnaire linguistique de l'École de Prague. Utrecht and Anvers: Spectrum Publishers.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1978). Pragmatics: an annotated bibliography with particular reference to speech act theory. Library and Information Sources in Linguistics, 4. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1978–1979). Pragmatics: an annotated bibliography. Part 1, Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 373–400.Google Scholar
Part III, Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 99–125.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C. F., Yamamoto, F. Y., A. Y., and F. M., (1977). Presuppositional culture spaces. Anthropological Linguistics, 19, 320–53.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (ed.) (1976 a). Linguistische Pragmatik, 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (1976 b). Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Yaguello, M. (1978). Les mots et les femmes. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar