Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:45:11.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vocabulary size research at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2014

Paul Nation  and
Averil Coxhead
Paul Nation
Affiliation:
LALS, Victoria University of Wellington, New [email protected]
Averil Coxhead
Affiliation:
LALS, Victoria University of Wellington, New [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The English Language Institute (now the School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies) at Victoria University of Wellington has a long history of corpus-based vocabulary research, especially after the arrival of the second director of the institute, H. V. George, and the appointment of Helen Barnard, whom George knew in India. George's successor, Graeme Kennedy, also saw corpus linguistics as a very fruitful and important area of applied language research.

Type
Research in Progress
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 398 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, L. & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography 6.4, 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing 27.1, 101–118.Google Scholar
Biemiller, A. & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 93.3, 498–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34.2, 213–238.Google Scholar
Elgort, I. (2013). Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing 30.2, 253–272.Google Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, I. I. S. P. & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics 11.4, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lorge, I. & Chall, J. (1963). Estimating the size of vocabularies of children and adults: An analysis of methodological issues. Journal of Experimental Education 32.2, 147–157.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines 5.1, 12–25.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Using dictionaries to estimate vocabulary size: Essential, but rarely followed, procedures. Language Testing 10.1, 27–40.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). Fundamental issues in modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. In Daller, H., Milton, J. & Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–43.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher 31.7, 9–13.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Nguyen, L. T. C. & Nation, I. S. P. (2011). A bilingual vocabulary size test of English for Vietnamese learners. RELC Journal 42.1, 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J. & Chapelle, C. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing 18.1, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing 18.1, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1924). The vocabularies of school pupils. In Bell, J. C. (ed.), Contributions to education. New York: World Book Co., 69–76.Google Scholar