Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:14:37.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Usage-based instruction, systems thinking, and the role of Language Mining in second language development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2020

ZhaoHong Han
ZhaoHong Han*
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Plenary Speech
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 502 - 517
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is based on the author's keynote delivered at the 2019 Conference of the Chinese English Language Education Association.

References

Avermaet, P., & Gysen, S. (2009). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 143–170). New York, NY: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Berent, G., Kelly, R., Aldersley, S., & Schmitz, K. (2007). Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students’ improvement in English grammar. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In Davies, A. & Elder, C. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 82–105). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2018). Plasticity, variability, and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(81), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). The logical problem of foreign language learning. In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(SI 02), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruton, A. (2002). From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal, 56(3), 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2005). Content-based foreign language instruction. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind & context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 282–302). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. (2017). Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, Y., & de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children's reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 451–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., & Jaspaert, K. (1995). Taalvaardigheidstoets: aanvang lager onderwijs onderwijs. Achtergronden. Leuven, Nederlands: Steunpunt Nederlands als Tweede Taal.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (2008). Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, Cognition and Language, 10(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dell, G., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C. (2018). Beyond statistical learning: Communication principles and language internal factors shape grammar in child and adult beginners learning Polish through controlled exposure. Language Learning, 68(4), 863–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (2016). Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction: Theoretical insights on the challenge of integration. In Cammarata, L. (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 25–50). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, Y., & Miller, S. (2016). Syntactic and lexical complexity of reading correlates with complexity of writing in adults. International Journal of Business Administration, 7(4), 1–10.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2006). Cognitive perspectives in SLA: The Associative Cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19(1), 100–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In VanPatten, B. & William, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 75–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In Spolsky, B., & Hult, F. (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 437–455). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). Investigating learning difficulty as implicit and explicit knowledge. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 143–193). New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2019). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research (Special issue on instructed SLA), 23(4), 454–475.Google Scholar
Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. (2018). Models linking production and comprehension. In Fernandez, E. & Cairns, H. (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 157–181). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2013). Constructionist approaches to language. In Hoffman, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.), Handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2006). Fossilization: Can grammaticality judgment be a reliable source of evidence? In Han, Z.-H. & Odlin, T. (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 56–82). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2016). A ‘reimagined SLA’ or an expanded SLA: A rejoinder to the Douglas Fir Group (2016). The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 736–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2018). Task-based learning in task-based teaching: Training teachers of Chinese as a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (Ed.). (2019). Profiling learner language as a dynamic system. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Finneran, R. (2014). Re-engaging the interface debate: Strong, weak none, or all? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Rast, R. (Eds.). (2014). First exposure to a second language: Learners’ initial input processing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Is the second language acquisition discipline disintegrating? Language Teaching, 46(4), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2019). An individual-differences framework for comparing nonnative with native speakers: Perspectives from BLC Theory. Language Learning, 69(SI), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2020). Proximate and ultimate explanations of individual differences in language acquisition and language use. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19027.hulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). Language style matching in writing: synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, E. Y. (2020). Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1995). Age before beauty: Johnson and Newport revisited. In Eubank, L., Selinker, L., & Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.), The current state of Interlanguage: Studies in honor of William Rutherford (1995) (pp. 219–231). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or couldn't natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CA: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, I., & Olshtain, E. (1996). Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. Language Awareness, 5(3–4), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Complexity theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 227–244). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity Theory: The lessons continue. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z.-H. (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. (2011). Intentional and incidental L2 learning. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 33–49). Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Han, Z.-H. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1(1), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487–535). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. (2011). Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language. Amsterdam, Nertherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Y. (2019). A dynamic view on morphosyntactic accuracy and complexity in dyadic interaction. In Han, Z.-H. (Ed.), Profiling learner language as a dynamic system (pp. 17–47). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MetaMetrics. (2015). Lexile infographic. Retrieved from https://www.lexile.com/about-lexile/lexile-overview/lexile-infographic/Google Scholar
Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(2), 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2015). Usage-based SLA: A research habitus whose time has come. In Eskildsen, W. & Cadierno, T. (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 353–374). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Han, Z.-H. (2017). Complexity theory and language development. In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S. (2011). Learner-generated noticing of written L2 input: What do learners notice and why? Language Learning, 61(1), 146–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2014). Neural integration of language production and comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), 15291–15292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York, NY: W. Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. South Yorkshire, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1996). Learning and triggering in adult L2 acquisition. In Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Performance and competence in SLA (pp. 70–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(2), 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9(1), 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, K. (Eds.), Syntax and variation reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 111–160). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stam, G. (2010). Can an L2 speaker's patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Han, Z.-H. & Cadierno, T. (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in second language acquisition: Thinking for speaking (pp. 59–83). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P., & Thomas, S. (2008). Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 166–178.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(5), 156–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Bavin, E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troyan, F. J. (2016). Learning to mean in Spanish writing: A case study of a genre-based pedagogy for standards-based writing instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1999). Unconscious second language acquisition: Alive and well. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 25, 114–131.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. (2010). Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input-processing in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2016). Why explicit knowledge cannot become implicit knowledge. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 650–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2017). Situating instructed language acquisition: Facts about second language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. (2017). Complexity Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 pedagogy: Lessons to be learned. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z.-H. (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development (pp. 143–162). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536–544.Google ScholarPubMed
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003a). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003b). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). Exploring the role of reformulation and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar