Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:27:04.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on the on-line processing of collocation: Replication of Wolter and Gyllstad (2011) and Millar (2011)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

Suhad Sonbul  and
Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
Suhad Sonbul
Affiliation:
Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Anna Siyanova-Chanturia*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research employing psycholinguistic techniques to assess the on-line processing of collocation by native and non-native speakers has flourished in the past few years. This line of research aims (among other things) at exploring actual performance in real time as opposed to the traditional paper-and-pencil testing techniques that have been extensively employed in collocation research. The present paper reviews some of the pertinent research on the on-line processing of collocations and argues for the need for more replication studies in the area. It then looks at how two experimental studies on the topic – Millar (2011) and Wolter and Gyllstad (2011) – may be replicated in order to gain deeper understanding of the key factors behind collocation processing and to obtain more valid and generalizable results that can find their way into language teaching practice.

Type
Replication Studies
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 236 - 244
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Davidson, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., & Carrol, G. (2018) First language influence on the processing of formulaic language in a second language. In Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna & Pellicer-Sanchez, Ana (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 62–77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). Learner corpora and psycholinguistics. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 57–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, K., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr, & Gonzales, G. P. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition, 20(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Cowie, A. P. (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 145–160). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2018) Formulaic sequences in learner corpora: Collocation and lexical bundles. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 228–246). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H. (2007). Testing English collocations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Howarth, A. P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (2001). Psycholinguistically oriented second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Why (or why not), when and how to replicate research? In Porte, G. (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp. 21–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. (2003). Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 19(2), 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, N. (2011). The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.). (2018). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2018) What on-line processing tells us about formulaic language. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (Eds.), pp. 38–61.Google Scholar
Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of incongruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2015). Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1193–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2018). Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing: What accounts for L2 performance?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S. (2018). Acquisition of formulaic language from a usage-based perspective. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 19–37).Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. A. N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar