Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:44:53.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research initiatives in the foreign and second language education program of Florida State University: Multiple perspectives, multiple approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019

Shaofeng Li*
Affiliation:
Florida State University, USA
Phil Hiver
Affiliation:
Florida State University, USA
Mostafa Papi
Affiliation:
Florida State University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research in the news
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 942).Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Li, S., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System, 80, 3847.Google Scholar
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 4459.Google Scholar
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741756.Google Scholar
Hiver, P., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Language teacher immunity: A double-edged sword. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 405423.Google Scholar
Hiver, P., Mercer, S., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (Eds.) (forthcoming). Engagement in the second language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2019). What is the ideal time to provide corrective feedback? Language Teaching, doi:10.1017/S026144481800040XGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics 40(3), 693722.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 123144). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100, 276295.Google Scholar
Papi, M. (2018). Motivation as quality: Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40(4), 707730.Google Scholar
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., & Jiang, C. (2019). Rethinking L2 motivation: The 2X2 model of self-guides. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 337361.Google Scholar
Papi, M., Rios, A., Pelt, H., & Ozdemir, E. (2019). Language learners’ feedback-seeking behavior: Basic components and motivational antecedents. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 205226.Google Scholar
Yun, S., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). Academic buoyancy: Exploring learners’ everyday resilience in the language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 805830.Google Scholar