Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:11:42.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research in Second Language Studies at Michigan State University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2013

Solène Inceoglu  and
Le Anne Spino
Solène Inceoglu
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Le Anne Spino
Affiliation:
Ph.D. students, Second Language Studies, Michigan State [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its inception seven years ago, Michigan State University's vibrant Second Language Studies (SLS) Program has grown quickly under the direction of Dr. Susan Gass. Thus far, twelve students have graduated from the program and now hold academic positions in various universities in the United States and elsewhere. In 2011, the department welcomed two new faculty members, Dr. Aline Godfroid and Dr. Bill VanPatten, making a total of eleven core faculty members, and in Spring 2012, Dr. Rod Ellis joined the department as affiliated faculty. The program currently includes 30 doctoral students working on a wide range of research topics.

Type
Research in Progress
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 272 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behney, J. (2011). L2 gender facilitation and inhibition in spoken word recognition. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Erlam, R. & Loewen, S. (2010). Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review 66.3, 871–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, D. (2010). Speaking correctly: Error correction as a language socialization practice in a Ukrainian classroom. Applied Linguistics 31, 346–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Behney, J. (forthcoming). L2 syntactic priming of subject and direct object relative clauses. In Schwieter, J. W. (ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J. & Uzum, B. (2013). Inhibitory control, working memory, and L2 interaction gains. In Droździał-Szelest, K. & Pawlak, M. (eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.) (2012). Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goertler, S. (2011a). For a smoother blend: Lessons learned from blended instruction. In Huffman, S. & Hegelheimer, V. (eds.), The role of CALL in hybrid and online language courses. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 1–12.Google Scholar
Goertler, S. (2011b). Blended and open/online learning: Adapting to a changing world of language teaching. In Arnold, N. & Ducate, L. (eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 471–502.Google Scholar
Goertler, S., Bollen, M. & Gaff, J. (2012). Students' readiness for and attitudes toward hybrid foreign language instruction: Multiple perspectives. CALICO Journal 29.2, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (ed.). (2009). Special issue on technology and learning pronunciation. Language Learning & Technology 13.3.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (2010). Visual and auditory input in second-language speech processing. Language Teaching 43, 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, D. M. & Motohashi Saigo, M. (2010). Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, S. (2011). ‘Ma sha Allah!’ Creating community though humor practices in a diverse Arabic language flagship classroom. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Hsieh, C. (2011). Rater effects in ITA testing: ESL teachers' versus American undergraduates' judgments of accentedness, comprehensibility, and oral proficiency. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 9, 47–74.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning 57.1, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (2 vols.). New York: Routledge, 576–592.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. & Reinders, H. (2011). Key concepts in second language acquisition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 61, 993–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Gass, S. M. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning 61, 325–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. London: Blackwell, 275–295.Google Scholar
Polio, C. (2012). How to research second language writing. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. London: Blackwell, 139–157.Google Scholar
Shea, M. (2011). Cohesion in second language writing. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Schierloh, M. (2011). Attention to irregular verbs by beginning learners of German: An eye-movement study. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Spinner, P. (2011). Second language assessment and morphosyntactic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydorenko, T. (2011). Item writer judgments of item difficulty versus actual item difficulty: A case study. Language Assessment Quarterly 8.1, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzum, B. (2010). An investigation of alignment in CMC from a sociocognitive perspective. CALICO Journal 28.1, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2012). Processing instruction. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 518–520.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. & Borst, S. (2012). The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in processing instruction: Nominative-accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals 45.1, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. (2011a). Evaluating the validity of a high-stakes ESL test: Why teachers' perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly 45.4, 628–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. (2011b). Investigating the reliability of the civics component of the U.S. Naturalization Test. Language Assessment Quarterly 8.4, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S. M. & Myford, C. (2011). The relationship between raters' prior language study and the evaluation of foreign language speech samples. TOEFL iBT® Research Report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S. M. & Sydorenko, T. (2013). Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Goertler, S. & Amuzie, G. L. (2010). Commonly-taught and less-commonly-taught language learners: Are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning? Computer Assisted Language Learning 23.3, 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar