Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:58:56.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Replication research in comparative genre analysis in English for Academic Purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2014

Helen Basturkmen*
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, New [email protected]

Abstract

In recent years a number of comparative studies based on an established approach to genre analysis have been published in the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) literature. Studies in this emerging strand of research typically aim to identify how the rhetorical structure of a particular genre (a text type) or part of a genre may vary across different disciplines or groups of writers. The first part of this article makes a case for replication in this strand of research, arguing that replication would be timely and suggesting the advantages that it could offer to the field of EAP. The second part focuses on three key studies, and suggests how each one might be replicated and the potential benefits of doing so.

Type
Replication Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 241251.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11.2, 134144.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bruce, I. (2009). Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes 28.2, 105124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, I. (2010). Textual and discoursal resources used in the essay genre in sociology and English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9.3, 153166.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2012). Genre and genre-based teaching. In Byram, M. & Hu, A. (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. New York: Routledge, 269274.Google Scholar
Charles, M., Pecorari, D. & Hunston, S. (eds.) (2009). Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1997). The biomedical discussion section in context. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. & Forest, R. W. (2009). Schematic structure and lexico-grammatical realization in corpus-based genre analysis: The case of research in the Ph.D. literature review. In M. Charles et al. (eds.), 15–36.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 16.4, 321337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30.4, 693722.Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. (ed.) (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. & Swales, J. M. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1, 1328.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, D. (2009). Persuading sponsors and securing funding: Rhetorical patterns in grant proposals. In M. Charles et al. (eds.), 37–57.Google Scholar
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J. & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lim, J. M.-H. (2010). Commenting on results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 280294.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Why (or why not), when, and how to replicate research. In G. Porte (ed.), 21–46.Google Scholar
Nesi, H. & Gardner, S. (2012). Genre across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis. An introduction (2nd edn). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30, 479497.Google Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Introduction. In Porte, G. (ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variation across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21, 117.Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24.2, 141156.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10.8, 238251.Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M. & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish Ph.D. thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes 30, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2009). Afterword. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari & S. Hunston (eds.), 291–294.Google Scholar
Tardy, C. M. (2011). ESP and multi-method approaches to genre analysis. In Belcher, D., Johns, A. M. & Paltridge, B. (eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 145173.Google Scholar
Upton, T. A. & Connor, U. (2012). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. In Biber, D. & Reppen, R (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Volume 1 Lexical Studies. Sage benchmarks in language and linguistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 109128.Google Scholar