Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:12:14.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Looking inside the world of peer review: Implications for graduate student writers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2018

Brian Paltridge
Brian Paltridge*
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Getting published in academic journals is increasingly important for research students in terms of gaining employment when they complete their studies and, in the future, for tenure and promotion applications once they have obtained an academic appointment. In this paper, I discuss some of the challenges that student (and early career) writers face when submitting articles to academic journals and, in particular, how they might better understand and respond to the reports they receive on their work.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 331 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Revised version of a plenary presentation delivered at the 1st Annual Conference of Asia ESP (English for special purposes) and the 6th Chinese National Symposium on ESP, 27–29 October 2017, Beijing, China.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Badenhorst, C. & Xu, X. (2016). Academic publishing: Making the implicit explicit. Publications 4, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar
BAAL (1993). Forum: Getting published in academic journals. British Association for Applied Linguistics Newsletter 43, 9–15.Google Scholar
Barbero, E. J. (2008). Journal paper requirement for Ph.D. graduation. Latin American and Caribbean Journal of Engineering Education 2.2, 51–53.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. & Waring, H. Z. (2005). Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In Frodesen, J. & Holten, C. (eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Thomson/Heinle, 67–80.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. D. (2001). Does second language writing theory have gender? In Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 59–72.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 16.1, 1–22.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curry, M. J. (2016). More than language: Graduate student writing as ‘disciplinary becoming’. In Simpson, S., Caplan, N. A., Cox, M. & Phillips, T. (eds.), Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, & program design. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 78–96.Google Scholar
Curry, M. J. & Lillis, T. (2013). A scholar's guide to getting published in English: Critical choices and practical strategies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Feak, C. B. (2009). Negotiating publication: Author responses to peer review of medical research articles in thoracic surgery. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 59, 17–34.Google Scholar
Feak, C. B. (2017). Making the most of different, but equally important types of expertise: Collaboration between disciplinary experts and ESP specialists on materials development. Plenary presentation, 1st Annual Conference of Asia ESP & the 6th Chinese National Symposium on ESP, 27–29 October 2017, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2009). Telling a research story: Writing a literature review. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2011). Navigating academia: Writing support genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2013). English for research publication purposes. In Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (eds.), Handbook of English for specific purposes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 301–321.Google Scholar
Fortanet, I. (2008). Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7.1, 27–37.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2012). Epilogue: The first–second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8.1, 111–134.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 52–57.Google Scholar
Huang, J. S. (2010). Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES Ph.D. students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9.1, 33–44.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7.2, 173–192.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016a). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic prejudice. Journal of Second Language Writing 31, 58–69.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016b). Language myths and publishing mysteries: A response to Politzer-Ahles et al. Journal of Second Language Writing 34, 9–11.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2017). Editorial. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 28, A1.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Jiang, K. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication 33.3, 251–274.Google Scholar
Iida, A. (2016). Scholarly publication: A multilingual perspective. In Macmaster, C. & Murphy, C. (eds.), Graduate study in the USA: Succeeding and surviving. New York: Peter Lang, 41–50.Google Scholar
Kwan, B. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education 59.1, 55–68.Google Scholar
Lee, I. (2014). Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language Teaching 47.2, 250–261.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2016). ‘Publish SCI papers or no degree’: Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 36.4, 545–558.Google Scholar
McGrath, L. & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practice. English for Specific Purposes 31.3, 161–173.Google Scholar
Murray, R. (2013). Writing for academic journals (3rd edn.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. M. & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2013). Learning to review submissions to peer reviewed journals: How do they do it? International Journal for Researcher Development 4.1, 6–18.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2017). The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2018). Writing for research purposes: Theory and practice. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (forthcoming). Reviewers’ feedback on second language writers’ submissions to academic journals. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (2016). Getting published in academic journals: Navigating the publication process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolama, T., Spychalska, M. & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing 34, 3–8.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sbisà, M. (2009). Speech act theory. In Verschueren, J. & Östman, J-O. (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 229–244.Google Scholar
Starfield, S. & Paltridge, B. (forthcoming). Perspectives of journal editors: Gatekeepers or custodians? In Habibie, P. & Hyland, K. (eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T., Kiley, M. & Fairbairn, H. (2017). Evaluation and instruction in Ph.D. examiners’ reports: How grammatical choices construe examiner roles. Linguistics and Education 42, 53–64.Google Scholar
Subtirelu, N. (2016). Denying language privilege in academic publishing. Linguistic pulse 6 February 2018. Available at https://linguisticpulse.com/2016/03/28/denying-language-privilege-in-academic-publishing/#more-2148.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today's research world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2011). Navigating academia: Writing support genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. Essential tasks and skills (3rd edn.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. (2017). What did that peer reviewer actually mean? Patter. Available at: https://patthomson.net/2017/01/12/what-did-that-peer-reviewer-actually-mean/.Google Scholar
Wisker, G. (2015). Getting published. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar