Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:25:34.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language testing part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Peter Skehan
Peter Skehan
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, London University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, J. C. (1978). A study of the doze procedure with native and non-native speakers of English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1979). The cloze procedure as a measure of proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1981). Reaction to Morrow paper. In Alderson & Hughes (eds.).Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1987 a). Levels of reading comprehension: do they exist? Paper presented at the Reading Conference on Language Testing, 03 1987.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (ed.) (1987 b). Innovation in language testing: can the microcomputer help? Special Report No. 1: Language Testing Update.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1988). Testing reading comprehension skills. Paper presented at the Sixth Colloquium on Research in Reading in a Second Language, TESOL Chicago, 03 1988.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. & Hughes, A. (1981). Issues in Language Testing. ELT Documents, III.Google Scholar
Alderson, C. J., Krahnke, K. J. & Stansfield, C. W. (eds.) (1987). Reviews of English language proficiency tests. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B. & Widdowson, H. C. (1984). Teaching the communicative use of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 1.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. B. & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. (1981). Formative evaluation in ESP program development. In Mackay, R. & Palmer, J. D. (eds.). Languages for Specific Purposes: program design and evaluation. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. (1982). The trait structure of cloze test scores. Tesol Quarterly, 16, 1, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. (1986). The Test Of English as a Foreign Language as a measure of communicative competence. In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar
Bachman, L. (1988). The development and use of criterion-referenced tests of language proficiency in language program evaluation. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), The coherent language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. (forthcoming). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Clark, J. (1987). The measurement of foreign/second language proficiency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 490, 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1981 a). The construct validation of the FSI oral interview. Language Learning, 31, 1, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1981 b). A multitrait-multimethod investigation into the construct validity of six tests of speaking and reading. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 4, 449–65.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1983). Oral Interview Test of Communicative Proficiency in English. Urbana, Ill.: Photo-offset.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1984). Some comments on the terminology of language testing. In Rivera (ed.) (1984 a).Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Savignon, S. (1986). The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: a critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 380–90.Google Scholar
Bates, M. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1982). Nucleus General Science; Teacher's Manual (expanded new edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M. & Zuengler, J. (1983). Accommodation theory: an explanation for style shifting in second language dialect studies. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Berk, R. A. (1980). A consumer's guide to criterion-referenced test reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 186–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1982). Some evidence for the integrity and interaction of two knowledge sources. In Andersen, R. W. (ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Wood-Smith, Shar M. (1985). Interlanguagc is not a state of mind. Applied Linguistics, 6, 101–17.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Enclehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Kratwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolus, R., Hinofotis, F. B. & Bailey, K. (1982). An introduction to gencralisability theory in second language research. Language Learning, 32, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brièhe, E. J. & Hinofotis, F. B. (eds.) (1979). Concepts in language testing: some recent studies. Washington, D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (1981) Notional syllabuses revisited – a response. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 90–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (1984). Grammar – communicative competence – functions/notions: implications for and from a proficiency orientation. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 17, 2, 194–206.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (1987). Second language acquisition: insights from a proficiency orientation. In Byrnes, H. & Canale, M. (eds.), Defining and developing proficiency: guidelines, implementations, and concepts. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1982). Cambridge examinations in English: changes in the syllabus 1984.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-mulrimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1983 a). From communicative competence to communicative performance. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and communication.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1983 b). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In Oller (ed.)Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1984 a). Considerations in the testing of reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 349–57.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1984 b). A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In Rivera (ed.), (1984 a).Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1985). Proficiency-orientated achievement testing. Paper presented at the Master Lecture Series of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, at the Defense Language Institute, 03 1985.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1986). The promise and threat of computerised adaptive testing. In Stansfield (ed.).Google Scholar
Canale, M. (forthcoming). The measurement of communicative competence. In Brumfit, C. J. (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1988. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N. (1986). Explaining communicative competence: limits of testability? In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar
Carroll, B. J. (1978). Specifications for an English language testing service. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing communicative performance. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Carroll, B. J. & Hall, P. J. (1985). Make your own language tests: a practical guide to writing language performance tests. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.). Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. In Oller (1983).Google Scholar
Chen, Z. & Henning, G. (1985). Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency tests. Language Testing, 2, 2, 155–63.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1985). Profiling second language development: a procedure for assessing L2 proficiency. In Hyltenstam & Pienemann (eds.)Google Scholar
Clark, J. (1978). Direct testing of speaking proficiency: theory and application. Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Clark, J. (1979). Direct vs. semi-direct tests of speaking ability. In Brièrc & Hinofotis (eds.).Google Scholar
Clark, J. & Hamilton, J. (1984), Syllabus. guidelines I. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Clifford, R. (1981). Convergent and discriminant validation of integrated and unitary language skills: the need for a research model. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1984). On taking language tests: what the students report. Language Testing, 1, 70–81.Google Scholar
Criper, C. & Davies, A. (1987). Edinburgh ELTS Validation Project: final report. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1983). Language proficiency and academic achievement. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: a theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In Rivera (ed.) (1984 b).Google Scholar
Cziko, G. (1981). Psychometric and edumetric approaches to language testing: implications and applications. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 28–44.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. (1982). Improving the psychometric, criterion-referenced, and practical qualities of integrative language tests. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 3, 367–79.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. (1984). Some problems with empirically-based models of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 5, 1, 23–38.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. & Lin, N.-H. J. (1984). The construction and analysis of short scales of language proficiency: classical psychometric, latent trait, and nonparametric approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 4, 627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, F., Hudson, T. & Lynch, B. (1985). Language testing: operationalisation in classroom measurement and L2 research. In Celce-Muria, M. (ed.). Beyond basics. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1977). The construction of language tests. In Allen, J. P. B. & Davies, A. (eds.), The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics: Vol. 4: Testing and experimental methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1978). Language testing: survey articles 1 and 2. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 11, 145–59 and 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1984). Validating three tests of English language proficiency. Language Testing, 1, 1, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1987). Review of Certificale of Proficiency in English. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar
Douglas, D. (1986). Communicative competence and tests of oral skills. In Stansfield (ed.).Google Scholar
Douglas, D. (1988). Testing listening comprehension in the context of the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 245–62.Google Scholar
Douglas, D. & Selinker, L. (1985). Principles for language tests within the ‘discourse domains’ theory of interlanguage: research, test construction, and interpretation. Language Testing, 2, 2, 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K. & Hernandez-Chavez, E. (1975). Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C., Bury, M. K., Hernandez-Chavez, E. & Taleporos, E. (1978). Bilingual syntax measure II. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1987), Interlanguagc variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1981). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. In Treuba, H. T., Guthrie, G. P. & Au, H. P. (eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom; studies in classroom ethnography. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Farhady, H. (1979). The disjunctive fallacy between discrete point and integrative testing. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 3, 347–57.Google Scholar
Farhady, H. (1980). Justification, development, and validation of functional language testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 1, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhady, H. (1983). On the plausibility of the unitary language proficiency factor. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Ideal readers and real readers. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1981. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Frith, J. R. (1982). Measuring spoken language proficiency. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Genessee, F. & Hamayan, E. (1980). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 95–110.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1979). Consequences of using the Rasch Model for educational assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 211–20.Google Scholar
Gorman, T. & Brooks, G. (1986). Assessing oracy. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar
Grotjahn, R. (1986). Test validation and cognitive psychology: some methodological considerations. Language Testing, 3, 2, 159–87.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, E. (1987). Review of First Certificate in English. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar
Hansen, J. & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship between field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31, 2, 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1986). Age in second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. (1986). Assessing text in action. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar
Hauptmann, P., Leblanc, R. & Wesche, M. (eds.) (1985). Second language performance testing. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Heaton, J. B. (ed.) (1982). Language testing. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Heaton, J. B. (ed.). (1988). Writing English language tests (new edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing. Cambridge, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Henning, G., Hudson, T. & Turner, J. (1985). Item response theory and the assumption of unidimensionality for language tests. Language Testing, 2, 2, 141–54.Google Scholar
Higgs, T. V. (1984). Teaching for proficiency: the organizing principle. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Higgs, T. V. & Clifford, R. T. (1982). The push towards communication. In Higgs, T. V. (ed.). Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher. Skokie, Il.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Hinofotis, F. B., Schumann, J., McGroahty, M., Erickson, M., Hudson, T., Kimbell, L. & Scott, M. L. (1982). Relating FSI oral interview scores to grammatical analyses of learners' speech. Manuscript, ESL Department, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hudson, T. & Lynch, B. (1984). A criterion-referenced approach to ESL achievement testing. Language Testing, 1, 2, 171–201.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (1981). Epilogue. In Alderson & Hughes (1981).Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (1986). A pragmatic approach to criterion-referenced foreign language testing. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (1988). Testing English for university study. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (in press). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, C. (1986). The classroom assessment of English language skills. Teaching English, 19, 3.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Pienemann, M. (eds.) (1985). Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. P. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1985). Assessing proficiency: an overview of some aspects of testing. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.).Google Scholar
Ingram, D. & Wylie, E. (1982). Australian second language proficiency ratings. Canberra: Australian Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (First Edition published 1979, Second Edition November 1982).Google Scholar
James, C. J. (ed.) (1985). Foreign language proficiency in the classroom and beyond. Lincolnwood, Ill.; National Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Johns, T. F. & Dudley-Evans, A. D. (1980). An experiment in the team teaching of overseas postgraduate students of the transportation and plant biology. ELT Documents, 106.Google Scholar
Jones, R. L. (1979). Performance testing of second language proficiency. In Brière & Hinofotis.Google Scholar
Jones, R. L. (1985 a). Some basic considerations in testing oral proficiency. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar
Jones, R. L. (1985 b). Second language performance testing: an overview. In Hauptman, LeBlanc & Wesche (eds.).Google Scholar
De Jong, J. H. A. L. & Glas, C. A. W. (1987). Validation of listening comprehension tests using item response theory. Language Testing, 4, 2, 170–94.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbum, D. (1981). LISREL V: user's guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar
Kilborn, M., Johnstone, R. & Kent, D. (1987). Adapting a theoretical framework for use in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics, Nottingham, 09 1987.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language journal, 70, 366–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (in press). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. P., Fok, A. C. Y. Y., Lord, R. & Low, G. (eds.) (1985). New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, J. (1983). Method effect in testing reading comprehension: a comparison of three methods. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Long, J. S. (1983 a). Covariance structure models: an introduction to LISREL. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Long, J. S. (1983 b). Confirmatory factor analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Low, G. (1981). Communicative testing as an optimistic activity. Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
Low, G. (1984). Validity and the problem of direct language proficiency. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 6.Google Scholar
Low, G. & Lee, Y. P. (nd). Testing what it's not: the problem of validating language tests. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Lowe, P. (1983). The oral interview: origins, applications, pitfalls, and implications. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 16, 230–44.Google Scholar
Lowe, P. (1985). The ILR proficiency scale as a synthcsising research principle: the view from the mountain. In James (ed.).Google Scholar
Lowe, P. (1986). Proficiency, panacea, framework, process? A reply to Kramsch, Schulz, and particularly, to Bachman and Savignon. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 391–7.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. (1983). Techniques in testing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. & Jones, R. L. (1981). Classification of oral proficiency tests. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar
Mead, R. J., Wright, B. D. & Bell, S. R. (1979). BICAL: version 3. Chicago: Dept. of Education, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M. (1988). The construction and validation of a performance-based battery of English language progress tests. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of London.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J. & Bock, D. (1984). Bilog II: item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1977). Techniques of evaluation for a notional syllabus. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: revolution or evolution? In Brumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K. (eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1986). The evaluation of tests of communicative performance. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1987). Review of University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate: Preliminary English Test. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, D., (1980). Engineering lecture discourse and listening comprehension. Report on English for Specific Purposes Project, King Abdul Aziz University: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd edition). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. (1971). Dictation as a device for testing foreign language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 25, 3, 254–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. W. (1972). Assessing competence in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 313–25.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school: a pragmatic approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. (ed.). (1983). Issues in language testing research. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. (1986). Communication theory and testing: what and how. In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. & Perkins, K. (1978). Intelligence and language proficiency as sources of variance in self-reported affective variables. Language Learning, 28, 1, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. W. & Perkins, K. (1980). Research in language testing. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oskarson, M. (1988). Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, University of Illinois, 03 1988.Google Scholar
Page, B. & Hewett, D. (1987). Languages step by step: graded objectives in the U.K. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. S., Ghoot, P. J. M. & Trosper, G. A. (1981). The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioural research: explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ptenemann, M. & Johnston, M. (1986). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–122.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Johnston, M. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, A. (in press). Diagnostic assessment through item banking. In Entwistle, N. (ed.). Handbook of educational ideas and practices. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pollitt, A. & Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing, 4, 1, 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politzer, R. L. & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 1, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popham, W. J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Portal, M. (ed.) (1986). Innovations in language testing. Windsor, Berks.: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Porter, D. (1983). Assessing communicative proficiency: the search for validity. In Johnson, K. & Porter, D. (eds.), Perspectives in communicative language teaching. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Porter, D. (in press). A language testing handbook. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Powers, D. E. (1986). Academic demands related to listening skills. Language Testing, 3, 1–38.Google Scholar
Rea, P. (1985). Language testing and the communicative teaching curriculum. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar
Rea, P. (1988). The relationship between grammatical abilities and aspects of communicative competence: with special reference to the testing of grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1985). Language curriculum development. University of Hawaii Working Papers, 4, 1, 1–40.Google Scholar
Rivera, C. (ed.) (1984 a). Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rivera, C. (ed.). (1984 b). Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clcvedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rivera, C. (ed.) (1984 c). Placement procedures in bilingual education: education and policy issues. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts (1981). Examinations in the communicative use of English as a foreign language: specifications and specimen papers. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar
Sang, F., Schmftz, B., Vollmer, H. J., Baumert, J. & Roeder, P. M. (1986). Models of second language competence: a structural equation approach. Language Testing, 3, 1, 54–79.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: a case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scott, M. L. & Madsen, H. S. (1983). The influence of retesting on test affect. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar
Seaton, I. (1982). Proficiency testing for tertiary level study and training in Britain. In Heaton (ed.).Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (1983). The stability of the oral proficiency trait on the oral interview speaking test. Language Learning, 33, 527–40.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (1984 a). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 2, 147–70.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (1984 b). Input and output in language testing. In Culhane, T., Klein-Braley, C. & Stevenson, D. (eds.). Practice and problems in language testing, 159–66. Occasional Papers. No. 29. Colchester. Essex Department of Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (1988). A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 165–80.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. & Reves, T. (1985). Authentic language tests: where from and where to? Language Testing, 2, 1, 48–59.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E., Reves, T. & Bejerano, Y. (1986). Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency. English Language Teaching Journal, 40, 212–20.Google Scholar
Sholz, G., Hendricks, D., Spurling, R., Johnson, M. & Vandenburg, L. (1980). Is language ability divisible or unitary? A factor analysis of 22 English language proficiency levels. In Oiler & Perkins (eds.).Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1984). Issues in the testing of English for specific purposes. Language Testing, 1, 2, 202–20.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 2, 188–221.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1987). Variability and language testing. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language learning ability, ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University: Working Documents No. 8.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (in press). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1978). Introduction: linguistics and language testers. In Spolsky, B. (ed.). Advances in Language Testing: series 2, Approach to language testing. VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1985). The limits of authenticity in language testing. Language Testing, 2, 2, 31–40.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1986). A multiple choice for language testers. Language Testing, 3, 2, 147–58.Google Scholar
Spurling, S. & Ilyin, D. (1985). The impact of learner variables on language test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 2, 283–301.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. (ed). (1986 a). Towards communicative competence testing: Proceedings of the Second TOEFL Invitational Conference.Princeton, N.J.:Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. (ed.) (1986 b). Technology and language testing. Washington. D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. (1986 c). A history of the Test of Written English: the developmental year. Language Testing, 3, 2, 224–34.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. (1981). Beyond faith and face validity: the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the convergent and discriminant validity of oral proficiency tests. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. (1985). Pop validity and performance testing. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985 a). Large-scale communicative language testing: a case study. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985 b). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (eds.). Input and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tall, G. (1981). The possible dangers of applying the Rasch Model to school examinations and standardised tests. In Lacey, C. & Lawton, D. (eds.). Issues in education and accountability. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability in interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, 143–63.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Test in English for Educational Purposes (TEEP) (1984). Information manual. Aldershot, Hampshire: Associated Examining Board.Google Scholar
Traub, R. E. (1983). A priori considerations in choosing an item response model. In Hambleton, R. K. (ed.). Applications of item response theory. Vancouver, B.C.: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language: a handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Upshur, J. A. (1979). Functional proficiency theory and a research role for language tests. In Brière & Hinofotis (eds.).Google Scholar
Upshur, J. A. & Homburg, T. J. (1983). Some relations among language tests at successive ability levels. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar
Vollmer, H. J. & Sang, F. (1983). Competing hypotheses about second language ability: a plea for caution. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. (1983). Identifying the language needs of overseas students in tertiary education in the United Kingdom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. (1988). Communicative language testing. Exeter Linguistics Studies No. 11: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. (1981). Communicative testing in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 551–71.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. (1987). Second language performance testing: the Ontario Test of ESL as an example. Language Testing, 4, 1, 28–47.Google Scholar
Wolf, A., Goldstein, H. & Silver, R. (1986). The same but different. Education Guardian, 06 3.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1985). Variability in tense marking: a case for the obvious. Language Learning, 35, 2, 229–53.Google Scholar
Woods, A. & Baker, R. (1985). Item response theory. Language Testing, 2, 2, 119–40.Google Scholar