Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hyland, Ken
and
Anan, Eri
2006.
Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience.
System,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
509.
Lee, Icy
2007.
Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?.
Assessing Writing,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
180.
Amaral, Luiz
and
Meurers, Detmar
2007.
User Modeling 2007.
Vol. 4511,
Issue. ,
p.
340.
Lee, Icy
2007.
Assessment for Learning: Integrating Assessment, Teaching, and Learning in the ESL/EFL Writing Classroom.
The Canadian Modern Language Review,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 1,
p.
199.
Lee, Icy
2008.
Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
144.
Lee, Icy
2008.
Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
69.
Lee, I.
2008.
Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
van Beuningen, Catherine
de Jong, N.H.
and
Kuiken, Folkert
2008.
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 156,
Issue. ,
p.
279.
Amaral, Luiz
and
Meurers, Detmar
2008.
From recording linguistic competence to supporting inferences about language acquisition in context.
Computer Assisted Language Learning,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
323.
Heift, Trude
and
Rimrott, Anne
2008.
Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL.
System,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
196.
van Beuningen, Catherine
de Jong, N.H.
and
Kuiken, Folkert
2008.
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 156,
Issue. ,
p.
279.
Ellis, Rod
Sheen, Younghee
Murakami, Mihoko
and
Takashima, Hide
2008.
The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context.
System,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
353.
Ellis, R.
2008.
A typology of written corrective feedback types.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
97.
Hyland, Ken
2008.
Genre and academic writing in the disciplines.
Language Teaching,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 4,
p.
543.
Dippold, Doris
2009.
Peer Feedback Through Blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class.
ReCALL,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
Cumming, Alister
2009.
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: TESTS, CURRICULA, AND TEACHING.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 29,
Issue. ,
p.
90.
Gilmore, A.
2009.
Using online corpora to develop students' writing skills.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 4,
p.
363.
CUMMING, ALISTER
2009.
What Needs to Be Developed to Facilitate Classroom‐Based Assessment?.
TESOL Quarterly,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
515.
HEIFT, TRUDE
2010.
Prompting in CALL: A Longitudinal Study of Learner Uptake.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 2,
p.
198.
Anderson, Paul
Bergman, Becky
Bradley, Linda
Gustafsson, Magnus
and
Matzke, Aurora
2010.
Peer Reviewing Across the Atlantic: Patterns and Trends in L1 and L2 Comments Made in an Asynchronous Online Collaborative Learning Exchange Between Technical Communication Students in Sweden and in the United States.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
296.