Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hyland, Ken
and
Anan, Eri
2006.
Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience.
System,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
509.
Lee, Icy
2007.
Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?.
Assessing Writing,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
180.
Lee, Icy
2007.
Assessment for Learning: Integrating Assessment, Teaching, and Learning in the ESL/EFL Writing Classroom.
The Canadian Modern Language Review,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 1,
p.
199.
Amaral, Luiz
and
Meurers, Detmar
2007.
User Modeling 2007.
Vol. 4511,
Issue. ,
p.
340.
Heift, Trude
and
Rimrott, Anne
2008.
Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL.
System,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
196.
Hyland, Ken
2008.
Genre and academic writing in the disciplines.
Language Teaching,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 4,
p.
543.
Lee, I.
2008.
Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
Amaral, Luiz
and
Meurers, Detmar
2008.
From recording linguistic competence to supporting inferences about language acquisition in context.
Computer Assisted Language Learning,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
323.
van Beuningen, Catherine
de Jong, N.H.
and
Kuiken, Folkert
2008.
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 156,
Issue. ,
p.
279.
Ellis, R.
2008.
A typology of written corrective feedback types.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
97.
Lee, Icy
2008.
Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
144.
Lee, Icy
2008.
Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
69.
van Beuningen, Catherine
de Jong, N.H.
and
Kuiken, Folkert
2008.
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 156,
Issue. ,
p.
279.
Ellis, Rod
Sheen, Younghee
Murakami, Mihoko
and
Takashima, Hide
2008.
The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context.
System,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
353.
Cumming, Alister
2009.
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: TESTS, CURRICULA, AND TEACHING.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 29,
Issue. ,
p.
90.
Dippold, Doris
2009.
Peer Feedback Through Blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class.
ReCALL,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
Gilmore, A.
2009.
Using online corpora to develop students' writing skills.
ELT Journal,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 4,
p.
363.
CUMMING, ALISTER
2009.
What Needs to Be Developed to Facilitate Classroom‐Based Assessment?.
TESOL Quarterly,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
515.
Storch, Neomy
and
Wigglesworth, Gillian
2010.
LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
303.
Hu, Guangwei
and
Lam, Sandra Tsui Eu
2010.
Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring peer review in a second language writing class.
Instructional Science,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
371.