Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:33:45.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computers and language learning: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Mark Warschauer  and
Deborah Healey
Mark Warschauer
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i, USA
Deborah Healey
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 57 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, R. (1985). Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, R. & Liou, H-C. (1991). Interaction generated by three computer programs: analysis of functions of spoken language. In Dunkel, P. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing, 85–109. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ahmad, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M., & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Juhani, S. O. (1992). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching English as a foreign language in Saudi secondary school. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 52, 2383–A.Google Scholar
Athelstan, , (1997). CALL bibliography. [Internet document] http://www.nol.net/~athel/athelbib.html.Accessed 10/20/97.Google Scholar
Basena, D. & Jamieson, J. (1996). CALL research in second language learning: 1990–1994. CÆLL Journal, 7 (1/2), 14–22.Google Scholar
Basena, D. & Jamieson, J. (1996/1997). Annotated bibliography of ESL CALL research: 1990–1994. CÆLL Journal, 7 (3), 12–19.Google Scholar
Bates, M., Borrow, R. J., & Weischedel, R. M. (1993). Critical challenges for natural language processing. In Bates, M. and Weischedel, R. M. (Eds.), Challenges in natural language processing (pp. 3–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botiono, B. D. (1992). The effect of three feedback forms on learning through a computer-based tutorial. CALICO Journal, 10, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, R. (1995). Web publishing for students of EST. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 363–4. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1991). TESOL at twenty-five: what are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25, 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (1993). The informational economy and the new international division of labor. In Carnoy, M., Castells, M., Cohen, S. S., & Cardoso, F. H., The new global economy in the information age: Reflections on our changing world, 15–43. University Park, Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1990). The discourse of computer-assisted language learning: toward a context for descriptive research. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1995). A framework for the investigation of CALL as a context for SLA. CÆLL Journal, 6 (3), 2–8.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. & Jamieson, J. (1989). Research trends in computer-assisted language learning. In Pennington, M. (Ed.), Teaching languages with computers, 45–59. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. & Jamieson, J. (1991). Internal and external validity issues in research on CALL effectiveness. In Dunkel, P. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing, 37–57. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. & Mizuno, S. (1980, December). Student strategies with learner-controlled CALL. CALICO Journal, 25–47.Google Scholar
Chen, J. F. (1997). Computer generated error feedback and writing process: a link. TESL-EJ, 2 (3). [electronic document] Available at http://violet.berkeley.edu/~cwp/TESL-EJ/ej07/a1.html. Accessed 10/19/97.Google Scholar
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookall, D., Coleman, D. W., & Versluis, E. B. (1990). Computerized language learning simulations: form and content. In Crookall, D. & Oxford, R. L. (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning, 165–82. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dalgish, G. M. (1991). Computer-assisted error analysis and courseware design: applications for ESL in a Swedish context. CALICO Journal, 9, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defelix, J. W., Johnson, R. T., & Schick, J. E. (1990). Socio and psycholinguistic considerations in interactive video instruction for limited English proficient students. Computers in the Schools, 7 (12), 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, A. (1995). Communicative CALL: student interaction using non-EFL software. CÆLL Journal, 6 (3), 25–33.Google Scholar
Dunkel, P. (1991). Simulations and games in L2 learning. CÆLL Journal, 2 (2), 8–16.Google Scholar
Dziombak, C. E. (1991). Searching for collaboration in the ESL computer lab and the ESL classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, A:The Humanities and Social Sciences, 51, 2296–A.Google Scholar
Eastment, D. (1996). The Internet and ELT: the impact of the Internet on English Language Teaching. London: British Council English 2000 Publications.Google Scholar
Englesberg, R. (1997). An evaluation study of a multimedia package for learning English. CÆLL Journal, 8 (1), 15–20.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1993). Nicolas: Using HyperCard with intermediate-level French learners. System, 10, 213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. (1995). Import/export e-mail business simulation. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 216–17. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Gaer, S. (1995). Folktales around the world. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 146–8. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Gay, G. (1987). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 225–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, K. & Dillon, N. (1997). Market grows for voice applications. Computerworld, 31 (32), 55–6.Google Scholar
Healey, D. (1993). Learner choices in self-directed second language learning. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (1997). CALL: A bibliography. [Internet document]. http://www.stir.ac.Uk/Departments/HumanSciences/EPD/celt/staff/higdox/callbib.htm. Accessed 10/20/97.Google Scholar
Hsu, J. J., Chapelle, C., & Thompson, A. D. (1993). Exploratory Learning Environments: What Are They And Do Students Explore? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanesen, K. J. & Tennyson, R. D. (1983). Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task. Educational Communication and Technology, 31, 226–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. & King, P. (Eds.) (1991). Classroom concordancing. ELT Journal 4, 27–45.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1986). It's not so much the program, more what you do with it: the importance of methodology in CALL. System, 14, 171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., & Fortescue, S. (1987). Using computers in the language classroom. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: a preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 441–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelm, O. (1995). E-mail discussion groups in foreign language education: Grammar follow-up. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai'i symposium. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Kendall, C. (1995). Cyber-surveys. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 97–100. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Kenning, M.-M., & Kenning, M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: current theory and practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, (4), 457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinmann, H. H. (1987). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on ESL reading achievement. Modern Language Journal, 71, 267–76.Google Scholar
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. & Hinckfuss, J. (1990). Program design and student talk. CÆLL Journal, 1 (4), 21–6.Google Scholar
Li, R.-C. (1995). English as a second language home page. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 349–50. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Liu, M. (1992). The effect of hypermedia-assisted instruction on second language learning: a semantic-network-based approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 53, 1134–A.Google Scholar
Lixl-Purcell, A. (1995). German area studies on the net. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 292–4. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Meskill, C. (1993). ESL multimedia: a study of the dynamics of paired student discourse. System, 21, 323–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, D. (1991). Maximizing CALL effectiveness in the classroom. CÆLL Journal, 2 (2), 20–25.Google Scholar
Neu, J. & Scarcella, R. (1991). Word processing in the ESL classroom: a survey of student attitudes. In Dunkel, P. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing, 169–87. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. (1987). Communicative language learning and the microcomputer. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Phinney, M. (1991). Computer-assisted writing and writing apprehension in ESL students. In Dunkel, P. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing, 189–204. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pinto, D. (1996). What does ‘schMOOze’ mean?: non-native speaker interactions on the Internet. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: proceedings of the Hawai'i symposium, 165–84. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Piper, A. (1986). Conversation and the computer: a study of the conversational spin-off generated among learners of English as a foreign language working in groups. System, 14 (2), 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, K. & Imbier, E. (1993). A videodisc project for ESL: ‘Who should do the house work?’ In Boettcher, J. (Ed.), 101 success stories of information technology in higher education: The Joe Wyatt challenge. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. (also online at http://educom.edu/stories.101/Videodisc-Project-for-ESL.txt )Google Scholar
Pujol, M. (1995/1996). ESL interactions around the computer. CÆLL Journal, 6 (4), 2–11.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. L. (1989). The CLCCS CALL study: Methods, error feedback, attitudes, and achievement. In Smith, W. F. (Ed.), Modem technology in foreign language education: applications and projects. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (1995). City net: travel the world from your desktop. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, 308–9. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: theoretical assumption, research, history, and typology. In Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 15–30. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, R. H. (1981). Meaningful practice on the computer: Is it possible? Foreign Language Annals, 14 (2), 133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schcolnik, M., Kol, S., Abarbanel, J., Friedler, J., Heymans, Y., & Tsafrir, Y. (1995/1996). Multimedia reference materials in advanced EFL courses: a project report. CÆLL Journal, 6 (4), 34–8.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, R. (1997). Annotated bibliography of the effectiveness of CALL. [Internet document], http://www.cltr.uq.oz.au:8000/interest/biblio.html.Accessed 10/20/97.Google Scholar
Sells, P., Shieber, S. M., & Wasow, T.(Eds.) (1991). Foundational issues in natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, S. K. & Liu, P. (1997). Computer-assisted language le arning bibliography [Internet document]. http://www.inform.umd.edu/EdRes/Colleges/ARHU/Depts/langctr/flit/biblio/bibliography.html.Accessed 10/20/97.Google Scholar
Soh, B.-L., & Soon, Y. P. (1991). English by e-mail: creating a global classroom via the medium of computer technology. ELT Journal, 45 (4), 287–92.Google Scholar
Spanos, G., & Smith, J. (1990). Closed captioned television for adult LEP literacy learners. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. (ED 321 623)Google Scholar
Stenson, N., Downing, B., Smith, J. & Smith, K. (1992). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training. CALICO Journal, 9 (4), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: a computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24 (4), 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tella, S. (1991). Introducing international communications networks and electronic mail into foreign language classrooms (Research report No. 95). Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tella, S. (1992a). Boys, girls and e-mail:a case study in Finnish senior secondary schools.(Research report No. 110). Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tella, S. (1992b). Talking shop via e-mail: a thematic and linguistic analysis of electronic mail communication. (Research report No. 99). Department of teacher education, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Thaipakdee, S. (1992). Relationships among writing quality, attitudes toward writing, and attitudes toward computers in a computer-mediated technical writing class for English as a foreign language students. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 53, 1135–A.Google Scholar
Trjbble, C. (1990). Small scale corpora in ELT: an investigation into vocabulary use. CÆLL Journal, 1 (4), 13–20.Google Scholar
Tribble, C. & Jones, C. (1990). Concordancing in the classroom. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher: a communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Underwood, J. (1989). On the edge: intelligent CALL in the 1990s. Computers and the Humanities, 23 (1), 71–84.Google Scholar
Vanderlinden, E. (1993). Does feedback enhance computer-assisted language learning? Computers and Education, 21, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Verano, M. (1989). USAFA interactive study in Spanish. In Smith, W. F. (Ed.), Modern technology in foreign language instruction. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Walker, B. (1994). EFL teachers' attitudes about CALL. CÆLL Journal, 5 (3), 12–15.Google Scholar
Wang, X. (1993). A CAI tutorial: teaching the English simple past tense to native speakers of Chinese. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 2354–A - 2355–A.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. M. (1993). E-mail dialogue journaling in an ESL reading and writing classroom. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Oregon at Eugene.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (Ed.) (1995). Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996a). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996b). Computer-assisted language learning: an introduction. In Fotos, S. (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching, 3–20. Tokyo: Logos.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1997) Electronic literacies: language, culture, and power in online education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar