Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:05:23.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Action, content and identity in applied genre analysis for ESP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

John Flowerdew
John Flowerdew*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, Hong [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genres are staged, structured, communicative events, motivated by various communicative purposes, and performed by members of specific discourse communities (Swales 1990; Bhatia 1993, 2004; Berkenkotter & Huckin 1995). Since its inception, with the two seminal works on the topic by Swales (1990) and Bhatia (1993), genre analysis has taken pride of place in much of the ongoing research in languages for specific purposes (LSP). The goal of much of this research is pedagogic, the understanding being that good genre descriptions can feed into pedagogy in the form of syllabus and materials design. Whereas genre analysis usually focuses on language as action, this paper argues that analysis needs to focus also on content and identity. The discussion sketches out what this might mean in terms of pedagogic application.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 516 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. P. B. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds.) (1974). English in Focus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Askehave, I. & Swales, J. M. (2000). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and possible solution. Applied Linguistics 22, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, M. R. C. & Dudley-Evans, A. (1976). Nucleus: General science. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. & Hirvela, A. (eds.) (2001). Special issue on voice in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10.1–2.Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1998). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bilbow, G. T. (1995). Requesting strategies in the cross-cultural business meeting. Pragmatics, 5.1, 45–55.Google Scholar
Bilbow, G. T. (1996). Managing impressions in the multicultural workplace: An impression management-based model for cross-cultural discourse analysis and awareness training for the workplace. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Bilbow, G. T. (1997). Cross-cultural impression management in the multicultural workplace: The special case of Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics 28, 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, G., T. (1998). Look who's talking: An analysis of ‘chair-talk’ in business meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12.2, 157–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C. (2000). Thesis writing for international postgraduates: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes 76.1, 3–14.Google Scholar
Davies, F. (1995). Introducing reading. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dressen, D. F. & , J. M. Swales (2000). ‘Geological setting/cadre géologique’ in English and French petrology articles: Muted indications of explored places. In Trosborg, A. (ed.) (2000), Analysing professional genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (1990). Problems of speech act theory from an applied perspective. Language Learning 40.1, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: a linguistic approach. In Johns, A. (ed.), Genres in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 91–102.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (in press). Reconciling approaches to genre analysis in ESP: the whole can equal more than the sum of the parts. In Belcher, D., Johns, A. & Paltridge, B. (eds.), New directions in ESP research. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (forthcoming). Some dichotomies in applied genre analysis. In Bhatia, V. K., Pérez–Paredes, P. & Sánchez Hernández, P. (eds.), Researching specialized language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2008). Small bits of textual material: A discourse analysis of Swales’ writing. English for Specific Purposes 27, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2009). Being Swales and Cameron: Constructing identity in applied linguistics. Talk given at University of Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R. (2005). Language, learning and identification. Paper presented at British Association of Applied Linguistics Conference. Bristol, UK. September. Downloaded on 18 February 2010. www.tlrp.org/dspace/handle/123456789/411Google Scholar
Lee, D. Y. W. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology 5.3, 37–72.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. (1975). The organisation of prose and its effects on recall. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mur Dueñas, P. (2007). ‘I/we focus on . . .’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. (1996). Genre, text type and the language classroom. ELT Journal 50.3, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication 10, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. & Zing, J. (2003). Managing rapport in intercultural business interactions: A comparison of two Chinese–British welcome meetings. Journal of Intercultural Studies 24.1, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, L. (1985). English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. (1976). The threshold level for modern language learning in schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses: A taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curriculum development. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar