Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:45:23.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. Lebaron, & Jenny Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003. Pp. xi, 625. Hb $99.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2004

Scott Saft
Scott Saft
Affiliation:
Hawai'i Tokai International College, Honolulu. HI 96826, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As stated in the Introduction, this edited volume aims to achieve two overlapping goals: to celebrate the diverse set of research falling under the label “language and social interaction” (LSI), and to honor the work and teachings of Robert Hopper, who died in 1998. Toward the first goal, the book begins, following the Introduction, with 32 original essays divided into 4 parts: “Orienting to the field of language and social interaction,” “Talk in everyday life,” “Talk in institutional settings,” and “Emerging trajectories: Body, mind, and spirit.” The contributors are largely researchers well known for their work in the area of conversation analysis (CA), including Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson, Paul Drew, John Heritage, Anita Pomerantz, Chuck Goodwin, and Gene Lerner, but the articles also cross disciplinary borders to incorporate research on cognitive processing, gesture, speech evaluations, sociolinguistic variables (e.g., gender), and ethnography. To meet the second goal, the volume not only brings together a mixture of Hopper's former students and colleagues, but it also ends with a fifth part, titled “Robert Hopper: Teacher and scholar,” which is devoted to more personal messages about Hopper and his work, including a final chapter with his acceptance speech for the National Communication Association mentorship award. This last section of the book brings the total number of chapters to 39 and the number of pages to more than 600 (including the Index).

Type
REVIEWS
Information
Language in Society , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 446 - 450
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Billig, Michael (1999). Whose terms? Whose orderliness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10:543–58.Google Scholar
Hopper, Robert (2002). Gendering talk. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hopper, Robert, & LeBaron, Curtis (1998). How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3):59–74.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia (2000a). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology 10:163–93.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia (2000b). How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(2):121–54.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia, & Frith, Hannah (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society 10:293–316.Google Scholar
Ohara, Yumiko, & Saft, Scott (2003). Using conversation analysis to track gender ideologies in social interaction: Toward a feminist analysis of a Japanese phone-in consultation TV program. Discourse and Society 14:153–72.Google Scholar
Paoletti, Isabella (2002). Caring for older people: A gendered practice. Discourse and Society 13:805–17.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8:165–87.Google Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth, & Weatherall, Ann (eds.) (2002). Special issue of Discourse & Society 13(6).
Wetherell, Margaret (1998). Positioning and interpretive resources: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:387–412.Google Scholar