Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:05.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic divergence in Fort Chipewyan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Eung-Do Cook
Eung-Do Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scollon and Scollon (1979) claimed that the consonantal system of Chipewyan in Fort Chipewyan has been reduced to 16 segments from 39 influenced by Cree, a case of linguistic convergence. This conclusion was based on their incoherent and indiscriminate admixture of variable data. While there is no Chipewyan speaker whose consonantal inventory includes only 16 phonemes, there is ample evidence for the merger of two series of coronal affricates in an innovative system like in other Athapaskan languages that have had no intimate contact with Cree. That is, there is evidence for intralinguistic divergence, but not for interlinguistic convergence. Neither is there any evidence to support another major claim by the Scollons that the sibilant alternations in Chipewyan are correlated with “world views.” All the changes, including sibilant alternations and coronal mergers, recorded in Fort Chipewyan are those frequently observed in other Athapaskan communities. (Language contact, change, convergence, divergence, variability, obsolescence, register, sociolinguistic variable)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 423 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carrier Dictionary Committee & Summer Institute of Linguistics. (1974). Central Carrier bilingual dictionary Fort St. James: Carrier Linguistics Committee.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1976). A phonological study of Chilcotin and Carrier (Report to National Museum of Man). Ottowa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1977). Syllable weight in three Northern Athapaskan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D.. (1980). On “variability of Chipewyan consonants” by Scollon, R.. International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 313–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1983). Chipewyan vowels. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D.. (1987). Chipewyan orthography In Ahenakew, F & Fredeen, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Native American Languages Issues Institute. Saskatoon: Saskatchewan Indian Language Institute. 21–33.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1989). Is phonology going haywire in dying languages? Phonological variations in Chipewyan and Sarcee. Language in Society 18(2) 1235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1978). The fate of morphological complexity in language death. Language 54: 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1968). Notes on a Chipewyan dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 34: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. (1980). Word shortening in Snowdrift Chipewyan. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 61–68.Google Scholar
Jehn, R. D. (1980). Aspects of current phonological change in Snowdrift Chipewyan. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 51–60.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. (1973). Na-Dene. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, 10. The Hague: Mouton. 283–358.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. (1933) A list of Chipewyan stems. International Journal of American Linguistics 7: 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei (1946). Chipewyan. In Hoijer, H. et al. , Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund. 398–423.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei, & Scollon, R. (1976). Chipewyan texts (Institute of Historv and Philology, Special Publication, 71). Taipei: Academica Sinica.Google Scholar
Morice, A. G. (1932). The Carrier language. 2 vols. Vienna: St. Gabnel-Mödling.Google Scholar
Rice, K. D. (1977). The continuants in Hare. International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. D. (1978). A note on Fort Resolution Chipewyan. International Journal oj American Linguistics 44: 144–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. D.. (1989). A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushforth, S. (1980). Review of Linguistic convergence: An ethnography of speaking at Fort Chipewyan Alberta, by Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.. Language in Society 9: 270–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxon, L. (1988). Dogrib working committee report to Language Bureau. Athapaskan Language Standardization Project, Department of Culture and Communications, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1985). The fate of ergativity in dying Dyirbal. Language 61: 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1979a). 236 years of variability in Chipewyan consonants. International Journal of American Linguistics 45: 332–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1979b). Variable data and linguistic convergence: Texts and contexts in Chipewvan. Language in Society 8: 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1979). Linguistic convergence: An ethnography of speaking at Fort Chipewyan, Alberta. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Seaman, P D. (1980). Review of Linguistic convergence: An ethnography of speaking at Fort Chipewyan, Alberta, by Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.. American Anthropologist 82: 874–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, G. (1984). Babine &Carrier phonology: A historically oriented study. Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Vittrekwa, E., & Pepper, M. (1988). Revised Gwich'in orthography. Language Bureau, Depariment of Culture and Communications, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Wald, B., & Shopen, T. (1981). A researcher's guide to the sociolinguistic variable (ING). In Shopen, T. & Williams, J. M. (eds.), Styles and variables in English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Winthrop. 219–49.Google Scholar
Wang, W S.-Y (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, H. C. (1973). Boundary maintenance in Algonquian: A linguistic study of Island Lake, Manitoba. American Anthropologist 75: 1305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, H. C, & Carroll, J. F (1981). Meet Cree: A guide to the Cree language. 2nd ed.Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar