Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:18:39.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jacqueline Knörr & Wilson Trajano Filho (eds.), Creolization and pidginization in contexts of postcolonial diversity: Language, culture, identity. Leiden: Brill, 2018. Pp. xiii, 387. Hb. €127.

Review products

Jacqueline Knörr & Wilson Trajano Filho (eds.), Creolization and pidginization in contexts of postcolonial diversity: Language, culture, identity. Leiden: Brill, 2018. Pp. xiii, 387. Hb. €127.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2020

Salikoko S. Mufwene
Salikoko S. Mufwene*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics University of Chicago 969 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Notes
Information
Language in Society , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 488 - 489
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTE

1 I should disclose for the reader that I submitted a contribution on this issue for this volume but the editors rejected it precisely because I argued against the abusive reference to ‘creolization’ (a term that I also find less informative than ‘the emergence of creoles’, which are structurally diverse). I also object to ‘cultural pidginization’, because the reader will discover that no simplification of any culture or anything comparable to ‘broken language’, traditionally associated with pidgins, is the case in this book. According to the editors, my contribution ‘does not really fit the overall theme and theoretical approach of the book we have in mind’ (16 July 2015), which is evident.