Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:42:55.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I have nothing to hide: The language of Ilongot oratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Michelle Rosaldo
Michelle Rosaldo
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ilongots of the northern Philippines traditionally value a speech style, ‘crooked language,’ rich in art, wit, and indirection, in certain situations. Purun ‘oratory’, both as event and speech style, is one of these. A brideprice meeting is recounted and examined in detail. Unique features of oratory, in contrast to everyday verbal interaction, depend on its public character, as a scheduled event with large audience (rather than special setting, personnel or ritual), and as having the purpose of achieving explicit, formal understanding and agreement. The special features of oratory include body-motion; category labels for self-reference; degree of use of deferential, self-deprecating, and qualifying phrases and terms; degree of use of metalinguistic terms generally; and rhythms. Degree of use of these features may vary in the course of the event. Acculturation has brought about conflict with the preference of newly educated and missionized Ilongots for ‘straight speech’. In effect, the indirect ‘crooked’ speech style is linked with indigenous egalitarian norms, while the public use of ‘straight speech’ is linked with externally imposed authoritarian relationships. (Speech styles and social structure; public performance everyday interaction; discourse devices; metalinguistic concepts and devices; conflict of speech norms; social change; Northern Luzon, Philippines: Malayo-Polynesian.)

Type
Articles: On the Ethnography of Oratory
Information
Language in Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1973 , pp. 193 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. & Bauman, R. (1971). Sense and nonsense in St. Vincent: speech behavior in a Caribbean community, AmA 73. 762–72.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. (1972). The training of a man of words in talking sweet. LinS I. 15–29.Google Scholar
Albert, E. (1964). ‘Rhetoric,’ ‘logic,’ and ‘poetics’ in Burundi: cultured patterning of speech behavior. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds), The ethnography of communicalion. (AmA 66 (6) Pt a). Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association. 35–54.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1950). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1975), Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.) Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 349–70.Google Scholar
Frake, C. (1964). A structural description of Subanun ‘religious behavior’. In Goodenough, W. (ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill. 131–66.Google Scholar
Frake, C. (1969). Struck by speech: the Yakan concept of litigation. In Nader, (ed.) Law in culture and society. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co. 147–68.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, and Sturtevant, (eds), Anthropology and human behavior. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington. 92–107.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.(ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolinizat ion of languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, (1972a). Editorial introduction. LinS I. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.(1972b). The contribution of folklore to sociolinguistic research. In Paredes, A. and Bauman, R. (eds), Toward New Perspectives in Folklore. Austin: University of Texas Press. 42–50.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters. New York, The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (in press). Norm-makers and norm-breakers: Uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In Sherzer, J. and Bauman, R. (eds), The ethnography of speaking. London and New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1971). The notion of ‘system’ in creole languages. In Hymes, D. (ed), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7–72.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis, Essays on the verbal and visual arts, Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12–44.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. (1969). A little knowledge. In Tyler, S. (ed), Cognitive anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 449–69.Google Scholar
Moerman, M.(1972). Analysis of Lue conversation: providing accounts, finding breaches, and taking sides, in Sudnow, D. (ed), Studies in interaction. New York: The Free Press. 170–228.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. & Sacks, H. (1971). On the analysis of natural conversation. Paper presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New York City.Google Scholar
Perelman, C. (1963) The idea of justice and the problem of argument, translated by John, Petrie. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. (1971). Context and metaphor in Ilongot oral tradition. (Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Harvard.)Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. (1972). Metaphor and folk classification, SJA 28. 83–99.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1970). Ilongot society: the social organization of a non-Christian group in Northern Luzon, Philippines. (Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Harvard.)Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (ms). Words for their ancestry: categories of affiliation among the Ilongot.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1967). Lecture notes, U.C.L.A., mimeographed.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories told by children. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston. 325–45.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (in press). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Sherzer, & Bauman, (eds), The ethnography of speaking. London and New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schlegloff, E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings, AmA 70 (6). 1075–95.Google Scholar
Schlegloff, E. (1972). Notes on conversational practice: formulating place, in Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in interaction. New York: Free Press. 75–559.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudnow, D. (ed.) (1972). Studies in interaction, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar