No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dell Hymes and John Fought, American structuralism. (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 102.) The Hague: Mouton, 1981. Pp. vi + 296.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983
References
REFERENCES
Agassi, J. (1981). Science and society. Studies in the sociology of science. Boston and Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bahner, W. (1981). Theoretische und methodologische Aspekte in der Historiographic der Sprachwissenschaft. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 29: 1281–93.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1939). Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 8: 105–15.Google Scholar
Bollmfield, L. (1946). Algonquian. In Hoijer, H. et al. , Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation. 85–129.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1936). A grammar of the Phoenician language. New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1939). Development of the Canaanite dialects: An investigation of linguistic history. New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1974a). Studies in the history of linguistics: Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. (1978). Western histories of linguistic thought: An annotated chronological bibliography, 1822–1976. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. (ed.) (1980). Progress in linguistic historiography: Papers from the International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (Ottawa, 28–31 August 1978). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. (1966). Outline of stratficational grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Parret, H. (ed.) (1976). History of linguistic thought and contemporary linguistics. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. (1976). The applicability of Kuhn's paradigms to the history of linguistics. Language 52:285–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. (ed.) (1975). Current trends in linguistics, vol. 13: Historiography of linguistics (assoc. eds. Aarsleff, H., Austerlitz, R., Hymes, D., & Stankiewicz, E.). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1980). Histoire et historiographic de la linguistique. Semiotica 31:107–37.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1981a). The history-writing of linguistics: A methodological note. General Linguistics 21:11–16.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1981b). Comment écrire l'histoire de la linguistique? Lingua 55:63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1981c). Western histories of linguistic thought: Additional bibliography. Language Problems & Language Planning 5:279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1982b). Le morphophonème: Sa place dans la description linguistique. In Dominicy, M. (ed.), Linguistics in Belgium V. Brussels: Didier-Hatier. 171–85.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1982c). La construction d'une théorie de l'historiographie de la linguistique: Quelques réflexions méthodologiques. To appear in the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (Lille, 2–5 September 1981).Google Scholar
Teeter, K. (1964). Descriptive linguistics in America: Triviality vs. irrelevance. Word 20:197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twaddell, W. (1935). On defining the phoneme. (Language Monograph 16.) Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C., & Harris, Z. (1945). Index to the Franz Boas collection of materials for American Linguistics. (Language Monographs 22.) Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.Google Scholar