Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:27:54.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Academic writing and global inequality: Resistance, betrayal and responsibility in scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2005

Extract

A review of A. Suresh Canagarajah, A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2002. Pp. x, 332. Pb. $27.95.

Type
REVIEW ARTICLE
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, Aijaz (1992). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. London: Verso.
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Critical linguistics, New Times and language education. In R. Clark et al. (eds.) Language and power: Proceedings of the 1989 Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics. CILT, 7–20.
Habermas, Jürgen (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Kandiah, Thiru (1995). Centering the periphery of English: Towards participatory communities of discourse. Foreword to Parakrama (1995), xvxxxvii.
Kandiah, Thiru (2001). ‘Intelligibility’? ‘Understanding’?: Further awkward questions from the New Englishes. In Edwin Thumboo (ed.), The three circles of English: Language specialists talk about the English language, 10314. Singapore: UniPress.
Kandiah, Thiru (2003). Review of Thomas Ricento, ed., Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English. English World-Wide 23:31724.Google Scholar
Parakrama, Arjuna (1995). De-hegemonizing language standards: Learning from (post) colonial Englishes about English. London: Macmillan.
Yeatman, Anna (1990). Bureaucrats, technocrats, femocrats: Essays on the contemporary Australian State. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.