Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:18:14.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William M. O'Barr & Jean F. O'Barr (eds.), Language and politics. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 10.) The Hague and Paris: Mouton & Co., 1976. Pp. xvi + 506.

Review products

William M. O'Barr & Jean F. O'Barr (eds.), Language and politics. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 10.) The Hague and Paris: Mouton & Co., 1976. Pp. xvi + 506.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jonathan Poole
Jonathan Poole
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, DO-30University of WashingtonSeattle, Washington 98195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1980 , pp. 104 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. B. W. (1978). When two languages meet, who speaks for the interpreter? Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Program of the 9th World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, August.Google Scholar
Rustow, D. A. (1968). Language, modernization, and nationhood: An attempt at typology. In Fishman, J. A., Ferguson, C. A., & Gupta, J. Das (eds.), Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 87–105.Google Scholar
Simard, L. M. & Taylor, D. M. (1973). The potential for bicultural communication in a dyadic situation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences 5: 211–225.Google Scholar