Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:45:43.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward an empirical base in pragmatics (Review Article)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Deborah Schiffrin
Deborah Schiffrin
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 381 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dik, S. (1968). Coordination. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Dillon, G., Coleman, L., Fahnestock, J., & Agar, M. (1985). Review article on Brown and Yule, Discourse analysis; Leech, Principles of pragmatics; and Levinson, Pragmatics. Language 61(2)446–60.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Replies and responses. In Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 5–77. (Originally published in Language in Society 5:257–313, 1976.)Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). Why linguistics needs the sociologist. In Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 69–81.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. (1969). “&.” Journal of Linguistics 6:111–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1971). If's and's and but's about conjunction. In Fillmore, C. & Langendoen, D. (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 115–50.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1980). Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. In Kiefer, F. & Searle, J. (eds.), Pragmatics and speech act theory. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. 87–122.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 75–119.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1986). The functions ofand in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 10:41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987a). Defining the context of an utterance. Linguistics 25–1(287):11–32. (Special issue on variation and discourse, edited by N. Dittmar.)Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987b). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (in press). Conversation analysis. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmerling, S. (1975). Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3). New York: Academic. 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar