Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:17:28.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“She does have an accent but…”: Race and language ideology in students' evaluations of mathematics instructors on RateMyProfessors.com

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Nicholas Close Subtirelu
Nicholas Close Subtirelu*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4099, Atlanta, GA 30302-4099, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nonnative English speakers (NNESs) who teach at English-medium institutions in the United States (US) have frequently been the subject of student complaints. Research into language ideologies concerning NNESs in the US suggests that such complaints can be understood as manifestations of a broader project of social exclusion operating, in part, through the ideological construction of the NNES as incomprehensible Other. The present study explores the extent to which such ideological presuppositions and exaggerative performances are observable in students' evaluations of ‘Asian’ mathematics instructors on the website RateMyProfessors.com (RMP). A mixed methodological approach combining statistical analysis of numeric RMP ratings, quantitative corpus linguistic techniques, and critical discourse analysis was employed. Findings confirm the presence of disadvantages related to ‘Asian’ instructors' race and language. However, RMP users' discourse is shown to be less overtly discriminatory and instead to reproduce dominant language ideology in subtle, previously undescribed ways.(Student evaluations, higher education, university teaching, nonnative speakers, second language users, ethnicity, critical discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, formulaic language)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 35 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albrecht, W. Steve, & Hoopes, Jeff (2009). An empirical assessment of commercial web-based professor evaluation services. Journal of Accounting Education 27:125–32.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul (2004). ‘Unnatural acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:88–106.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul; Gabrielatos, Costas; KhosraviNik, Majid; Krzyżanowski, Michał; McEnery, Tony; & Wodak, Ruth (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19:273–306.Google Scholar
Berdie, Douglas R.; Anderson, John F.; Wenberg, Michael S.; & Price, Candice S. (1976). Improving the effectiveness of teaching assistants: Undergraduates speak out. Improving College and University Teaching 24:169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergin, Adam; Sharp, Kevan; Gatlin, Todd A.; Villalta-Cerdas, Adrian; Gower, Austin; & Sandi-Urena, Santiago (2013). Use of RateMyProfessors.com data as a supplemental tool for the assessment of general chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 90:289–95.Google Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, April, & Michels, Kelsey (2010). RateMyProfessors.com: Testing assumptions about student use and misuse. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15(5). Online: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v15n5.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael J.; Baillie;, Michelle & Fraser, Shawndel (2009). Rating RateMyProfessors.com: A comparison of online and official student evaluations of teaching. College Teaching 57:89–92.Google Scholar
Brutt-Griffler, Janina, & Samimy, Keiko K. (2001). Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes 20:99–106.Google Scholar
Center for College Affordability and Productivity (2012). Compiling the Forbes/CCAP Rankings. Online: http://centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/2012_Methodology.pdf; accessed June 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Coladarci, Theodore, & Kornfield, Irv (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12(6). Online: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n6.pdf.Google Scholar
Davison, Elizabeth, & Price, Jammie (2009). How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:51–65.Google Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons (2011). Making immigrants illegal in small-town USA. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21:E35–55.Google Scholar
Edwards, Autumn, & Edwards, Chad (2013). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication: The influence of mixed reviews on student perceptions of instructors and courses. Communication Education 62: 412–24.Google Scholar
Edwards, Autumn; Edwards, Chad; Shaver, Carrie; & Oaks, Mark (2009). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on RateMyProfessors.com: Expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14:368–92.Google Scholar
Edwards, Chad; Edwards, Autumn; Qing, Qingmei; & Wahl, Shawn T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education 56:255–77.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2001). Language and power. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Fitch, Fred, & Morgan, Susan E. (2003). “Not a lick of English”: Constructing the ITA identity through student narratives. Communication Education 52:297–310.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H. (2007). kfNgram (Version 1.3.1). Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Academy.Google Scholar
Fox, Wanda S., & Gay, Geneva (1994). Functions and effects of international teaching assistants. The Review of Higher Education 18:1–24.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren (2010). Ethnicity and sociolinguistic variation in San Francisco. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:458–72.Google Scholar
Halleck, Gene B., & Moder, Carol Lynn (1995). Testing language and teaching skills of international teaching assistants: The limits of compensatory strategies. TESOL Quarterly 29:733–58.Google Scholar
Helterbran, Valeri R. (2008). The ideal professor: Student perceptions of effective instructor practices, attitudes, and skills. Education 129:125–38.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, Tarique M. (2009). Hot or not: An analysis of online professor-shopping behavior of business students. Journal of Education for Business 85:165–71.Google Scholar
Institute of International Education (2013). Open doors report 2013. Open doors report on international educational exchange. Online: http://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data; accessed June 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Kang, Okim, & Rubin, Donald L. (2009). Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28:441–56.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongbin; Twombly, Susan; & Wolf-Wendel, Lisa (2012). International faculty in American universities: Experiences of academic life, productivity, and career mobility. New Directions for Institutional Research 2012:27–46.Google Scholar
Kindred, Jeannette, & Mohammed, Shaheed N. (2005). “He will crush you like an academic ninja!”: Exploring teacher ratings on RateMyProfessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10. Online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.x/full.Google Scholar
Kowai-Bell, Neneh; Guadagno, Rosanna E.; Little, Tannah; Preiss, Najean; & Hensley, Rachel (2011). Rate my expectations: How online evaluations of professors impact students' perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior 27:1862–67.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Gary W.; Higgins, Emma; & Nardone, Natalie N. (2011). Just a harmless website? An experimental examination of RateMyProfessors.com's effect on student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37:987–1002.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society 23:163–98.Google Scholar
Mackiewicz, Jo (2010). The co-construction of credibility in online product reviews. Technical Communication Quarterly 19:403–26.Google Scholar
Mateos, Pablo (2007). A review of name-based ethnicity classification methods and their potential in population studies. Population, Space and Place 13:243–63.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, & Hardie, Andrew (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory, and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, James; Sanford, Douglas A.; & Ross, Douglas N. (2008). Does RateMyProfessor.com really rate my professor? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33:355–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, & Wee, Lionel (2009). The three circles redux: A market–theoretic perspective on World Englishes. Applied Linguistics 30:389–406.Google Scholar
Plakans, Barbara S. (1997). Undergraduates' experiences with and attitudes toward international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly 31:95–119.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language an environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reid, Landon D. (2010). The role of perceived race and gender in the evaluation of college teaching on RateMyProfessors.Com. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 3:137–52.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33:511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Shane; Walia, Bhavneet; Potter, Joel; & Linna, Kenneth W. (2011). Do more online instructional ratings lead to better prediction of instructor quality? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 16(2). Online: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v16n2.pdf.Google Scholar
Scherr, Sebastian; Müller, Philipp; & Fast, Victoria (2013). Single comments or average ratings: Which elements of RateMyProfessors.com™ shape university students' judgments and course choice intentions? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25:131–41.Google Scholar
Sealey, Alison (2007). Linguistic ethnography in realist perspective. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:641–60.Google Scholar
Shuck, Gail (2004). Conversational performance and the poetic construction of an ideology. Language in Society 33:195–222.Google Scholar
Shuck, Gail. (2006). Racializing the nonnative English speaker. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 5:259–76.Google Scholar
Sonntag, Michael E.; Bassett, Jonathan F.; & Snyder, Timothy (2009). An empirical test of the validity of student evaluations of teaching made on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:499–504.Google Scholar
Steffes, Erin M., & Burgee, Lawrence E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research 19:42–59.Google Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas (2013). ‘English… it's part of our blood’: Ideologies of language and nation in United States Congressional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17:37–65.Google Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas (2014). A language ideological perspective on willingness to communicate. System 42:120–32.Google Scholar
Timmerman, Thomas (2008). On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. Journal of Education for Business 84:55–61.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (n.d.). Census regions and divisions of the United States. Online: https://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf; accessed April 22, 2013.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Dan. (2013). Closing the communication gap between undergraduates and international faculty. CATESOL Journal, 24:8–28.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A., & Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23:55–82.Google Scholar