Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:50:17.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisionist dialectology and mainstream linguistics (Review article)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Yakov Malkiel
Yakov Malkiel
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 29 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelung, J. H., & Vater, J. S. (1806–1817). Mithridares, oder aligemeine Sprachenkunde. 4 vols. Berlin: Vossische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Aebischer, P. (1978). Etudes de stratigraphie linguistique. (Romanica Helvetica 87.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Alvar, M., Llorente, A., & Salvador, G. (1961–1973). Atlas ling¨ístico y etnogrdfico de Andalucia. 6 vols. Granada: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
Ascoli, G. I. (1873). Saggi ladini. Archivio glottologico italiano 1: 1–556; folding map.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variations and linguistic theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Barrenechea, A. M., & Orecchia, T. 1970–1971). La ducplicación de objetos directos e indirectos en el espanol hablado en Buenos Aires. Romance Philology 24: 58–83.Google Scholar
Bartoli, M. (1925). Introduzione alla neolinguistica: Princìpi-scopi-metodi. Biblioteca dell' «Archivum Romanicum» 2:12. Genève: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Bartoli, M. & Vidossi, G. (1945). Alle porte orientali d'Italia: Dialetti e lingue della Venezia Giulia (Friuli e Istria); Stratficazioni linguisriche in Istria; con un'appendice di testi dialettali; map. Torino: Gheroni.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1975). The dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. (1948). A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24:3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, B. (1970). Bernard Bloch on Japanese. Roy, Andrew Miller, ed. (Yale Linguistic Series.) New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. & Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of linguistic analysis. Special publication of the Linguistic Society of America. Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1927). On recent work in general linguistics. Modern Philology 25: 211–30. Reprinted in Hockett, 1970. 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1944). Review of Bodmer, F., The loom of language in American Speech 19: 211–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodmer, F. (1944). The loom of language, ed., Hogben, L.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Borrego, Nieto J. (1981). Sociolingüística rural; investigación en Villadepena de Santiago. (Acta Salmanticensia: Filosofía y Letras 120.) Salamanca: Ediciones de la Universidad.Google Scholar
Bottiglioni, G. (1933–1942). Atlante lingüístico etnográfico italiano della Corsica. 11 vols. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bottiglioni, G. (1952). Dizionario delle parlate corse; indice dell' ALEIC. Modena: Società tipografica modenese.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1972). Phonological rules and dialect variation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1904). A sketch of the linguistic conditions of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago 1:6. 97–114.)Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1957). The Linguistic Survey of Scotland. Orbis 6:105–21.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. C. J. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic forces in Panama. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectolagy. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, M. (1973). Cross-dialectal comparison: A case study and some theoretical considerations. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1:38–63.Google Scholar
Cochrane, G. R. (1959). The Australian English vowels as a diasystem. Word 15:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, F. A. (1871).Sobre a língua portuguesa. In Frei, Domingos Vieira, Grande Dicionário Portuguêes. ou Tesouro da Língua Portuguesa. I:ix–ccxlviii. Porto: E. Chardron & B. H. de Morais. etc.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1981). Dialecto. nivel y estilo de lengua. Lingüística espanola actual 3:1–32.Google Scholar
Cuervo, R. J. (1867–1872). Apuntaciones críticas sobre el lenguaje logotano. Bogotá: A. M. Guarín.Rev. 4th ed., Chartres: Imprimeries de Durand, 1885; rev. 6th ed., Paris: R. Roger & F. Chernoviz. 1914; rev. 9th ed., Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 1955.Google Scholar
Dauzat, A. (1955). La méthode des nouveaux atlas linguistiques de la France. Orbis 4: 22–31.Google Scholar
Deanović, M. (1938). Per un atlante e un dizionario etimologico delle voci mediterranee. Vox Romanica 3:315–20.Google Scholar
De, Camp D. (1953). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
De Camp, D. (1958, 1959). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. Orbis 7:372–91; 8:54–77.Google Scholar
De Gorog, R. (1982). Review of Aid, F. M., Resnick, M. C., & Saciuk, B. (eds.) 1975 Colloquium on Hispanic Linguistics; and G. E. Scavnicky (ed.), Dialectología hispanoamericana: Estudios actuales. Romance Philology 36: 242–53.Google Scholar
Duraffour, A. (1926). Trois phénomènes de nivellement phonétique en franco-provençal. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 27 (1): 68–80.Google Scholar
Duraffour, A. & Jeanton, G. (1935). L'habitation paysanne en Bresse: études d'ethnographie …étude linguistique. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
Elcock, W. D. (1938). De quelques affinités phonétiques entre l'aragonais et le béarnais. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
Elizaincin, A. (1976). The emergence of bilingual dialects on the Uruguayan–Brazilian border. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The Social Dimensions of Dialectology): 123–33.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. (1889). On early English pronunciation, 5: The existing phonology of English dialects. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flórez, L. (1957). Habla y cultura popular en Antioquia: materiales para un estudio. Bogoté: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Flórez, L. (1962). Léxico de la casa popular urbana en Bolívar, Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Flórez, L. (1965). El español hablado en Santander. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Flórez, L. & Buesa, Oliver T. (1954 [5–6]). El atlas lingüísico-etnográfico de Colombia (ALEC). Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Flutre, L.-F. (1972). Review of Duraffour, A., Glossaire des patois francoprovençaux, 1969. Romance Philology 26:157–63.Google Scholar
Fontanella, de Weinberg M. B. (1979). Dinámica social de un cambio lingüísrico. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar
Frank, Y. H. (1948). The speech of New York City. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Frings, T. (1913). Srudien zur Dialektgeographie des Niederrheins zwischen D¨sseldorf undAachen. (Deutsche Dialektgeographie 5 Wrede, F., ed.) Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Frings, T. (1924). Rheinische Sprachgeschichte. Essen: G. D. Baedeker.Google Scholar
Frings, T. & Vandenheuvel, J. (1921). Die südniederländischen Mundarten: Texte, Untersuchungen, Karten. (Deutsche Dialektgeographie 16.) Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, E. (1928). Die Sprachgeographie und ihre Ergebnisse für die allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. Bielefeld and Leipzig: Velhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, E. & Spitzer, L. (1915). Die Bezeichnungen der ‘Klette’ im Galloromanischen. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gil(I), A. (1619). Logonomia Anglica. qua genus sermofacilius addiscitur. London: I. Beale.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, J., & Roques, M. (1912). Études de géographie linguistique, d' après l' atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Gregg, R. J. (1964). Scotch–Irish urban speech in Ulster. In Adams, G. B.. Ulster dialects: An introductory symposium. Belfast: Ulster Folk Museum.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr. (1942). Latin -ks- in Italian and its dialects. Language 18:117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haust, J., & Remacle, L. (1953– ). Atlas linguistique de la Wallonie. Tableau géographique des parlers de la Belgique romane d' aprés l' enquête de J. Haust et des enquêtes complémentaires. 4 vols. Liège: H. Vaillant-Carmanne, for: Centre universitaire de dialectologie wallonne et Bibliotheque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres (Liège).Google Scholar
Herzog, M. I. (1967). Bibliography of Uriel Weinreich. Language 43: 607–10.Google Scholar
Herzog, P. (1916). Die Bezeichnung der täglichen Mahlzeiten in den romanischen Sprachen und Dialekten: eine onomasiologische Untersuchung. Zürich dissertation.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. H. (1970). A LeonardBloomfield anthology. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hoijer, H. (ed.) (1965). Language history from [Leonard] Bloomfield's “Language”. (1933 edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hotzenköcherle, R. (1962– ). Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz, vol. I: Einfūhrungsband; Lautgeographie: Vokalqualität. Bem: Francke.Google Scholar
Houck, C. L. (1968). Methodology of an urban speech survey. (Leeds Studies in English [New Series] 2.)Google Scholar
Hsieh, H-I. (1973). A new method of dialect subgrouping. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1:64–92.Google Scholar
Hubbell, A. F. (1950). The pronunciation of English in New York City. Consonants and vowels. Columbia University dissertation. New York: King's Crown Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1964). Language and culture in society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
lordan, I., & Orr, J. (1937). An introduction to Romance linguistics: Its schools and scholars. Oxford: Blackwell. Rev. 2nd ed., 1970; see also Posner (1970).Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1936). Aspects géographiques du langage: conférences faites au Collège de France (déc. 1933). Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1940). Der Rumänische Sprachatlas [ALR, ALRM; S. Puşcariu] und die Struktur des dacorumānischen Sprachgebiets. Vox Romanica 5: 49–86.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1954–1955). Grossräumige und kleinräumige Sprachatlanten. Vox Romanica 14: 1–61.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1956–1957). The birthmark in folk belief, language, literature, and fashion. Romance Philology 10: 307–42.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1960). Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz: Index. Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. (1965). Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungen und Erlebnisse. Neue Folge. Heinimann, S., editor. (Romanica Helvetica 75.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. & Jud, J. (1928–1940). Sprach- und Sachatlas italiens und der Südschweiz (=AIS), 8 vols Zofingen: Ringier.Google Scholar
Kahane, H. R. (1941). Designations of the cheek in the Italian dialects. Language 17: 212–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, H. R. (1981). Graeca et Romanica: Scripra Selecta. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Kahane, H., & Kahane, R. (1976–1977). Lingua franca; The story of a term. Romance Philology 30: 25–41.Google Scholar
Kjederqvist, J. (1904). The dialect of Pewsey (Wiltshire). In Transactions of the Philological Society 1903–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, E. (1966). Phonological atlas of the northern region. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Kuhn, A. (1935). Der hocharagonesische Dialekt.Revue de linguistique romane 11: 1–312.Google Scholar
Kuhn, A. (1947–1948). Sechzig Jahre Sprachgeographie in der Romania. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 1: 25–63.Google Scholar
Kuhn, A. (1951). Romanische Philologie, I: Die romanischen Sprachen. (Wissenschaftliche Forschungsberichte, Geisteswissenschaftliche Reihe 8.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. et al. , (1939). Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. (1965). Die Lautgestalt einer Kärtner Mundart und ihre Geschichte. Supplement 2 (New Series) to Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. (1939–1943). Linguistic atlas of New England. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B. (1981). Sociolinguistics. In Posner, R. & Green, J. N. (eds.), Trends in Romance linguistics and philology. 2; Synchronic Romance linguistics. 129–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J. (1967). Speech variation in a piedmont community: Postvocatic /r/. international Journal of American Linguistics 33:4:2 (Explorations in sociolinguistics; Lieberson, S. ed.) 76–98.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. (ed.) (1967). Explorations in sociolinguistics = International Journal of American Linguistics 33:4:2 ( = Publication 44).Google Scholar
Livingston, C. H. (1957). Skein-winding reels: Studies in word history and etymology. (University of Michigan Publications, Language and Literature, 29.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
López, Morales H. (ed.) (1978). Corrientes actuales en la dialectología del Caribe hispánico. Actas de un simposio. Universidad de Puerto Rico: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
López, Morales H. & Vaquero de Ramírez, M. (eds.) (forthcoming), Actas del l Congreso Internacional sobre el espaňol de América. Río Piedras: Editorial Universitaria de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1967a). Uriel Weinreich (1926–1967). Language 43: 604–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1967b). Each word has a history of its own. Glossa 1 137–49.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1968–1969). Necrology: Uriel Weinreich–Jakob Jud's last student. Romance Philology 22:128–32.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1970). Patterns of derivational affixalion in the Cabraniego dialect of East-Central Asturian. (University of California Publications, Linguistics 64.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1971–1972). A straightforward report on the latest “crisis” in Romance linguistics. Romance Philology 25:216–24.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1972). Linguistics and philology in Spanish America: A survey (1925–70). (lanua Linguarum: Series Minor 97.) The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1976). From Romance philology through dialect geography to sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The social dimension of dialectology): 59–84.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1978–1979). Editorial comment: A partial return to Bernardino Biondelli? Romance Philology 32: 502–04.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1982). Infinitive endings, conjugation classes, nominal derivational suffixes, and vocalic gamuts in Romance. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 17:15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. (Bibliotheca Romanica 1:10.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1956). La description phonologique, avec application au parler franco-provençal d'Hauteville (Savoie). (Publications romanes et francaises 56.) Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
McDavid, R. I. (1948). Postvocalic /r/ in South Carolina: A social analysis: American Speech 23:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1952). Introduction to a survey of Scottish dialects. Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Pidal R. (1952). Toponimia prerrománica hispana. (Biblioteca romànica hispànica 2:9.) Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Moulton, W. G. (1960). The short-vowel systems of Northern Switzerland: A study in structural methodology. Word 16:155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, W. G. (1968). Structural dialectology. Language 44:451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, (Tomás) T. (1948). El espaňol en Puerto Rico. Contribución a la geografia lingüistica hispanoamericana. Río Piedras, P. R.: Editorial de Ia Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Navarro, (Tomás) T. (1975). Capitulos de geografia linguistica de Ia Peninsula lbérica. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
[Navarro, (Tomás) T. & Sanchis, Guarner M.] (1962). Atlas ling¨istico de la Península Ibérica, I: Fonética, I. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
Newton, B. (1972). The generative interpretation of dialect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orbis: Bulletin international de documentation linguistique (1952– ). Louvain: Centre international de dialectologie generale.Google Scholar
Orr, J. 1935 Memorandum [on a linguistic survey of Scotland]. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Orr, J. (1953). Words and sounds in English and French. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Orr, J. (1963). Essais d'étymologie et de philologie françaises. (Bibliotheque francaise et romane, Ser. A:4.) Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Orton, H. (1962). Survey of English dialects: Introduction. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Wright, N. (1975). Word geography of England. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Orton, H. et al. , (1978). Linguistic atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Paris, G. (1888). Les parlers de France. Revue des patois gallo-romans 2:162–75.Google Scholar
Petyt, K. M. (1970). Emily Brontë and the Haworth dialect. Keighley: Yorkshire Dialect Society Publications.Google Scholar
Petyt, K. M. (1980). The study of dialect: An introduction to dialectology. (The Language Library.) London: André Deutsch Ltd.Google Scholar
Pickford, G. R. (1956). American linguistic geography: A sociological appraisal. Word 12:211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop, S. (1950). La dialectologie: aperçu hisrorique et méthodes d'enquétes linguistiques. 2 vols. (Recueil de travaux d'histoire et de philologie 3. 38–39.) Louvain: Université.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1970). Thirty years on. Supplement to 2nd ed. of lordan & Orr (1937). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. (1964). Structural comparison, diasystems, and dialectology. Linguistics 4:66–82.Google Scholar
Putnam, G. N., & O'Hern, E. M. (1955). The status significance of an isolated urban dialect. Language Dissertation 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revue des patois gallo-romans (1887–1992), Gilliéron, J. & abbé, Rousselot, eds. vols. Paris: H. Champion, etc.Google Scholar
Rona, J. P. (1976). The social dimension of dialectology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The social dimension of dialectology): 7–22.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, M. ([1754], 1973). Carálogo de voces y frases de la lengua gallega, Pensado, J. L., ed. (= Obras lingilisticas del Padre Sarmienro, 2). Acta Salmantina, Filosofla y Letras 72.)Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, Bally, C. & Sechehaye, A., eds. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar
Scheuermeier, P. (1920). Einige Bezeichnungen f¨r den Begrifj ‘Höhle’ in den romanischen Alpendialekten …; ein wortgeschichtlicher Beitrag zum Studium der alpinen Geländeausdr¨cke. Supplement 79 to Zeitschrfl f¨r romanische Philologie and Z¨urich dissertation.Google Scholar
Scheuermeier, P. & Boesch, P. (1934) Wasser- und Weingefässe im heutigen Italien. Sachkundliche Darsiellung auf Grund der Materialien des AIS. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Schmeller, J. A. (1821). Die Mundarten Bayerns, grammatisch dargesfeilt. M¨nchen: Thienemann.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1872). Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H.(1885). Über die Lautgesetze; gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: R. Oppenheim.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1876). Grundz¨ge der Lautphysiologie. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (in press). Review of Posner, R. & Green, J. N. (eds.), Trends in Romance linguistics and philology, 2: Synchronic Romance linguistics. To appear in Romance Philology.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.(in press). Review of Fontanella de Weinberg, M. B., Dinámica social de un cambio ling¨ísrico. To appear in Romance Philology.Google Scholar
Siverisen, E. (1960). Cockney phonology ]based on Oslo dissertation, 1951.] Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E. (1957). On discreteness and continuity in structural dialectology. Word 13:44–59, to maps.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappolet, E. (1895). Die romanischen Verwandrschaftsnamen, mit besonderer Ber¨cksichtigung der französischen und italienischen Mundarten. Em Beitrag zur vergleichenden Lexikologie. Strassburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. (1897). Essais de philologie française. Paris: E. Bouillon.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (1902). Mélanges d'étymologie française. Université de Paris: Bibliothèque de la Faculté des Lettres 14. Pans: F. Alcan. Rev.2nd ed., Collection linguistique 22, Paris: H. Champion, 1927.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (1904). Nouveaux essais de philologie française. Paris: E. Bouillon.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. R. (1973). The linguistic geography of Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974a). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974b). Sociolinguistics: An introduction. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ureland, P. S. (1978). Sprachkontakte im Nordseegebiet. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliu, E. (1966). Towards a generative phonology of Daco-Rumanian dialects. Journal of Linguistics 2: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasmer, M. (1960– ). Wörterbuch der russischen Gewässernamen. Osteuropa-Institut an der Freien Universit?t Berlin, Slavistische Veröffentlichungen 22. Berlin & Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Vasmer, M. (1962–1964). Russisches geographisches Namenbuch, Coper, I. & Bräuer, H., eds. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Wiesbaden: C. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Vidal de Battini, B. E. (1949). El habla rural de San Luis. (Biblioteca de dialectología hispanoamencana 7.) Buenos Aires: Instituto de Filología.Google Scholar
Viereck, W. (1966). Phonematische Analyse des Dialekts von Gateshead-upon-Tyne, Co. Durham, Hamburg: Cram & de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S-Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartburg, W. von (1937). Betrachtungen ¨ber die Gliederung des Wortschatzes und die Gestaltung des Wörterbuchs. Zeitschrifl f¨r romanische Philologie 57: 296–312.Google Scholar
Wartburg, W. von (1956). Sinn und Aufgaben des französischen etymologischen Wörterbuches. In Von Sprache und Mensch – gesammelte Aufsätze. Bern: Francke. 166–77.Google Scholar
Weigand, G. (1909). Linguistischer Atlas des dacorumänischen Sprachgebietes. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Weinreich, M. (1955–1956). The Jewish languages of Romance stock and their relations to earliest Yiddish. Romance Philology 9: 403–28.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1954) Is a structural dialectology possible Word 10: 388–400 (= Linguistics Today, Martinet, A. & Weinreich, U., eds. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 2).Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (c. 1955–1965). Language and culture atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U.(ed.) (1965, 1969). The field of Yiddish: Studies in folklore, language, and literature. 2ndand 3rd collections. The Hague; Mouton.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin; University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1973). Jamaican pronunciation in London. Oxford; Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winteler, J. (1876). Die Kerenzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus, in ihren Grundz¨gen dargestelit. Leipzig; C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
Wrede, F., & Mitzka, W. (1926–1926). Deutscher Sprachatlas, auf Grund des von Georg Wenker begr¨ndeten Sprachatlas des Deutschen Reichs … Marburg; Elwert.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1892). A grammar of the dialect of Windhill in the West Riding of Yorkshire. London; Kegan Paul; Trench; Tr¨bner.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1898–1905). English dialect dictionary. London; Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, J. T. (1966).Urban dialects; A consideration of method. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 33:232–47.Google Scholar