Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:24:24.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW FOCUS: BOUNDARIES IN DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

RUTH WODAK
RUTH WODAK
Affiliation:
Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YT, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Discourse analysts come from a variety of intellectual traditions (systemic-functional linguistics, American descriptive linguistics, ethnomethodology, and critical theory among them) and work in a variety of ways. As a result, there is recurring discussion among practitioners about the boundaries that constitute discourse analysis as a field/theory/method in relation to other fields/theories/methods. The following reviews all take up this discussion in treatments of discourse analysis in recent textbooks and other programmatic work. Readers should note that this collection is the result of happy editorial coincidence – Ruth Wodak proposed a review article that came to press about the same time as other book reviews fitting this theme arrived at LiS. It is not the result of a systematic attempt to cover the field, which would require the kind of intellectual boundary-work these reviews report on and represent.

Barbara Johnstone, Editor

Type
REVIEW ARTICLE
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 595 - 611
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. (1960) How to do things with words. London: Clarendon Press.
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus–based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics 4:197–226.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Billig, M. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.), 35–46.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak & P.A. Chilton (eds.) A new agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology, and interdisciplinarity. 19–53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehlich, K. (1992). Language in the professions: Text and discourse. In A. Grindsted & J. Wagner (eds.) Communication for specific purposes/Fachsprachliche Kommunikation, 9–29. Tübingen: Narr.
Ehlich, K. (2000). Diskurs. In H. Glück (ed.), Metzler Lexikon Sprache, 162–63. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Ensink, T., & Sauer, C. (2003) (eds.). The art of commemoration. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. London: Polity.
Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of New Labour: Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell et al. (eds.), 229–66.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Text analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 256–84.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Rhetorical strategies and identity politics in the discourse of colonial withdrawal. Journal of Language and Politics 1:149–80.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). The orders of discourse. In M. Shapiro (ed.), The Language of Politics. 9–54. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freud, S. (1982 [1930]). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. In his Studienausgabe, Vol. 9: Fragen der Gesellschaft: Ursprünge der Religion, 191–270. Frankfurt a. Main.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). On grammar. Collected Works, vol. 1. London: Continuum.
Heer, H.; Manoschek, W.; Pollak, A.; & Wodak, R. (2003) (eds.). Wie Geschichte gemacht wird: Erinnerungen an Wehrmacht und zweiten Weltkrieg. Vienna: Czernin.
Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press
Jäger, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of critical discourse analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods in critical discourse analysis, 32–62. London: Sage.
Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Lalouschek, J.; Menz, F.; & Wodak, R. (1990). Alltag in der Ambulanz. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Lazar, M. (2005) (ed.). Feminist critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave.
Leinfellner, E. (2004). Vom Bild ohne Rahmen zum Rahmen ohne Bild – und das Jenseits von Rahmen und Bild: Eine Diskussion zu “Text und Kontext”. In O. Panagl & R. Wodak (eds.), 267–96.
Lutz, B., & Wodak, R. (1987). Information für Informierte. Vienna: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Maas, U. (1988). Probleme und Traditionen der Diskursanalyse. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 41:717–29.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Wodak, R. (2003) (eds.). Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods in critical discouse analysis, 14–31. London: Sage.
Muntigl, P.; Weiss, G.; & Wodak, R. (2000). European Union discourses on unemployment: An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Panagl, O., & Wodak, R. (2004) (eds.). Text & Kontext. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Pfeiffer, O.; Strouhal, E.; & Wodak, R. (1987). Ein Mann auf dem Lande vor dem Gesetz. Folia Linguistica 20:505–39.Google Scholar
Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. W. (2002, reprinted 2004). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
Ranke, L. (1867–1890). Englische Geschichte. Samtliche Werke, vol. 15. Leipzig.
Reisigl, M. (in press). Diskurs =/= Diskurs =/= Diskurs. European Journal of Semiotics.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. London: Routledge.
Schiffrin, D.; Tannen, D.; & Hamilton, H. (2001) (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
Seidlhofer, Barbara (2003) (ed.). Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thiesmeyer, L. (2004) (ed.). Discourse and silencing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Titscher, S.; Meyer, M.; Wodak, R.; & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (1990). Social cognition and discourse. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology, 163–86. New York: John Wiley.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) (ed.). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin et al. (eds.), 352–71.
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.), 85–109.
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003) (eds.). Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wetherell, M.; Taylor, S.; & Yates, S. J. (2001) (eds.). Discourse as data. London: Sage.
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, pretext. Critical issue in discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders in discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis and the study of doctor-patient interaction. In B.-L. Gunnarsson et al. (eds.), The construction of professional discourse, 173–200. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale et al. (eds.), Qualitative research practice, 197–213. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. (2005a). Sprache und Politik. – Sprache in der Politik – Sprache/Sprechen über (Sprache in/und) Politik. Aptum 2:135–53.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2005b). Discourse analysis (Foucault). In D. Herman et al. (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 112–114. London: Routledge.
Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004). Approaches to media texts. In J. H. Downing (ed.), The Sage handbook of media studies, 105–23. London: Sage.
Wodak, R., & Chilton, P. A. (2005) (eds.). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001) (eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.