Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:48:02.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A rate of change index for language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Lawrence Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Southern California

Abstract

Although the rates of changes in language are customarily described in relative terms, this paper presents a method of quantifying the rate of a given change during a specific time period. Utilizing the results of recent studies of sound change in progress, the Rate of Change Index is applied to the data for the purpose of indicating precisely the speed of these changes. Also measured in this manner are the rates of change of a variable in different phonetic contexts and among different social classes. The comparisons made here lend support to two important theories: that linguistic change follows an S-curve and that change proceeds more rapidly in urban than in rural areas. The Index contributes, then, to an inductive model of sociolinguistic change. It is also suggested that the Index can be applied to syntactic and lexical changes as well. (Linguistic change, Sociolinguistics, Phonology.)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anshen, Frank (1970). A sociolinguistic analysis of a sound change. Language Sciences 9. 20–1.Google Scholar
Anshen, Frank (1973). Some data which do not fit some models. In Bailey, C.-J. N. and Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 62–8.Google Scholar
Antilla, Raimo (1972). An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brengleman, Frederick H. (1956). The native American English spoken in the Puget Sound Area. Unpublished dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic G. (1973). Dialect studies, regional and social. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 10. The Hague: Mouton. 75100.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Unpublished dissertation. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cook, Stanley J. (1969). Language change and the emergence of an urban dialect in Utah. Unpublished dissertation. University of Utah.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. (1958). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco, Part I. Orbis 7. 372–91.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. (1959). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco, Part II. Orbis 8. 5477.Google Scholar
Duckert, Audrey R. (1963). The linguistic atlas of New England revisited. PADS 39. 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, L. (1905). L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hermann, M. E. (1929). Lautveränderungen in der individualsprache einer mundart. Nachrichten der gesellschaft der wissen-schaften zu Göttigen, philosophisch-historische klasse II. 195214.Google Scholar
Howren, Robert Ray (1958). The speech of Louisville, Kentucky. Unpublished dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1973). Lexicostatistics and glottochronology in the nineteenth century (with notes toward a general history). In Dyen, I. (ed.), Lexicostatistics in genetic linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 122–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Lawrence (1974) A sociolinguistic study of selected vowel changes in Los Angeles English. Unpublished dissertation. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1966). The social stratfication of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972a). The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In Stockwell, R. P. and Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 101–71.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972b). The recent history of some dialect markers on the island of Martha'ps Vineyard, Massachusetts. In Davis, L. (ed.), Studies in linguistics in honor of Raven I. McDavid, Jr. University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press. 81122.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972c). On the use of the present to explain the past. Paper presented to the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
Martinet, André (1945). La prononciation du français contemporain. Berne: Franke.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Lee. (1964) The pronunciation of English in Metropolitan Chicago. PADS. 44. 196.Google Scholar
Reichstein, Ruth (1960). Etude des variations sociales et géographiques des faits linguistiques. Word 16. 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1972). Linguistic evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Lang. Soc. I. 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. and Cheng, Chin-Chuan (1970). Implementation of phonological change: the Shu´ng-féng Chinese case. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 552–9.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Fasold, Ralph W. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar