Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:23:24.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perspectives on sociolinguistic variation (Review article)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Ralph W. Fasold
Affiliation:
Department of LinguisticsGeorgetown University

Extract

This chapter [of Sociolinguistic patterns – RWF] will deal with the study of language structure and evolution within the social context of the speech community. The linguistic topics to be considered here cover the area usually named “general linguistics,” dealing with phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics (Labov 1972:184). Surely, this is too narrow a conception of the role of sociolinguistic research (Romaine 1982:6).

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C.J. N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
Blom, J-P. & Gumperz, J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 97195.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1972). Tense marking in Black English. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (eds.) (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. 3rd ed.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Guy, G. (1974). A new look at -t, -d deletion. In Fasold, R. & Shuy, R. (eds.), Studies in linguistic variation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 112.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1978). Variable rules, community grammar, and linguistic change. In Sankoff, (1978). 7182.Google Scholar
Kay, P. & McDaniel, C. (1979). On the logic of variable rules. Language in Society 8:151–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (In press). The exact description of a speech community: Short a in Philadelphia. In Fasold, R. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language change and variation. Orlando, Fl.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M., & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Le, Page R. (1968). Problems of description in multilingual Communities. Transactions of the Philological Society: 189212.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (ed.) (1978). Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Laberge, S. (1978). Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In Sankoff, (1978) 119–27.Google Scholar
Schatz, H. F. (1984). “Plat Amsterdams in its social context.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1974). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar