Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:33:54.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Painful to playful: Quotidian frames in the conversational discourse of older Japanese women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Yoshiko Matsumoto
Yoshiko Matsumoto
Affiliation:
Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Stanford UniversityBuilding 250, Main Quad, Stanford, CA 94305-2000, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conversations about serious life changes in old age may be expected to sound painful, but data of conversational narratives by elderly Japanese women even on topics related to illnesses or the death of a husband show highly engaging, lively exchanges, frequently accompanied by humor and laughter among the participants. The common feature in the conversations recounting psychologically intense experiences is a shift to detailed depictions of specific scenes from the quotidian perspective. This phenomenon, which I call quotidian reframing, is signaled by linguistic and paralinguistic quotidian framing cues. Quotidian reframing can function as a useful discourse strategy to relieve tension and let the participants regain the feeling or stance of quotidian self, the identity that they consider “normal.” A detailed account of the quotidian frame draws on such ideas as frame, footing, lamination, and positioning. (Discourse analysis, frame, identity, humor and laughter, older Japanese women)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , November 2011 , pp. 591 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhaus, Peter (2009). Politeness in institutional elderly care in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Politeness Research 5:53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, Michael G. W. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Live History 7(1–4):335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1953). The position of humor in human communication. In Foerster, H. von (ed.), Cybernetics, ninth conference, 1–47. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972/2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika A. (2005). Frames revisited: The coherence-inducing function of frames. Journal of Pragmatics 37:685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri. (1899/1911). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (2007). The importance of not being earnest: The feeling behind laughter and humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, Laura L., & Fredrickson, Barbara L. (1998). Socioemotional selectivity in healthy older and younger people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): The centrality of emotion when the future is constrained. Health Psychology 17:494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics 39:29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Justine; Coupland, Nikolas; Giles;, Howard & Henwood, Karen (1991). Formulating age: Dimensions of age identity in elderly talk. Discourse Processes 14:87–106.Google Scholar
Coupland, Justine; & Grainger, Karen (1991). Intergenerational discourse: Contextual versions of ageing and elderliness. Ageing & Society 11:189–208.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas; Coupland, Justine; & Giles, Howard (1991). Language, society and the elderly: Discourse, identity and ageing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas; & Henwood, Karen (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society 17:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas; Nussbaum, Jon F. (eds.) (1993). Discourse and lifespan identity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Davies, B., & Harré, Rom (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20:43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–38. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia. (2008). A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 37:319–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Karen (2004). Verbal play on the hospital ward: Solidarity or power? Multilingua 23:39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Toshiko (2001). Co-construction of meaning in intergenerational family conversations: A case of the Japanese demonstrative pronoun are. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Toshiko (2011). Family conversation as narrative: Co-constructing past, present, and future. In Matsumoto, Yoshiko (ed.), Faces of aging: The lived experiences of the elderly in Japan, 221–37. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Heidi E. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer's patient: An interactional sociolinguistics study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Heidi E. (2001). Discourse and aging. In Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, & Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 568–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine (2009). Managing unavoidable conflicts in caretaking of the elderly: Humor as a mitigating resource. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 200:103–28.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Susan (1993). Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 114–45. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of social action, 346–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Waletzky, Joshua (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2005). “We'll be dead by then!” Comical self-disclosure by elderly Japanese women. In Ettlinger, Marc, Fleisher, Nicholas, & Park-Doob, Mischa (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 268–79. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2007). Dealing with changes: Discourse of elderly Japanese women. In McGloin, Naomi H. & Mori, Junko (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 15, 93–107. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2008). Discourse of the elderly from the speaker's point of view. In Mori, Junko & Ohta, Amy S. (eds.), Japanese applied linguistics: Discourse and social perspectives, 188–210. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2009a). Dealing with changes – Humorous self-disclosure by elderly Japanese women. Ageing & Society 29(6):929–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2009b). To laugh or not to laugh: Responding to humor and laughter in narratives of illness and death. Paper presented at the 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 13–17, 2009.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko (2009c). Beyond stereotypes of old age: The discourse of elderly Japanese women. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 200:129–52.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics 35:1333–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. (2009). The construction of multiple identities in elderly narrators’ stories. Ageing & Society 29(6):903–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Jon F., & Coupland, Justine (2004). Handbook of communication and aging research. 2nd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor, & Attardo, Salvatore (1994). Non-literalness and non-bona-fide in language. Pragmatics and Cognition 2:31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard; Giles, Howard; Bartolucci, Giampiero; & Henwood, Karen (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communications by and with the elderly. Language and Communication 6(1/2):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard; Hummert;, Mary Lee & Boich, Linda H. (1995). Communication predicaments of aging: Patronizing behaviour toward older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13:144–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (2006). In other words: Variation in reference and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1979). What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Freedle, Roy (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 137–81. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2006). Intertextuality in action: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 26:597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2008). “We've never been close, we're very different”: Three narrative types in sister discourse. Narrative Inquiry 18(2):206–29.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 57–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Angie, & Nussbaum, Jon F. (2001). Intergenerational communication across the life span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In Antaki, Charles & Widdicombe, Sue (eds.), Identities in talk, 87–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar