Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:56:01.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On decreolization and language death in Gullah

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Patricia Jones-Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of English, Howard University

Abstract

The sociolinguistic pressures now exerted on the Gullah-speaking communities match the general conditions that DeCamp (1971b) described for postcreole speech communities or communities in which the traditional language variety is decreolizing or dying. There is a correspondence between the dominant official language and the creole, and there is sufficient breakdown in the formerly rigid social stratification brought on by educational programs and other acculturative forces to cause social mobility and to motivate large numbers of Gullah speakers to modify their speech in the direction of standard English. Preliminary research of the processes involved in this modification activity reveals that certain features of the pronominal system are elaborating and dying while certain other features of this system are remaining static and unchanged. Elaboration is well underway in the nominative case, for example, while in the objective case elaboration has barely begun. (Sociolinguistic pressures, postcreole, decreolizing or dying, social mobility, certain features, elaborating, static)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allsopp, Richard. (1958). Pronominal forms in the dialect of English used in Georgetown (British Guiana) and its environs by persons engaged in non-clerical occupations. M.A. thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Bailey, C-J. N., Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Berkeley Charleston Dorchester (BCD) Council of Governments (1979). Regional Housing Market Analysis.Google Scholar
Berkeley Charleston Dorchester (BCD) Council of Governments (1980). Report on economically less developed areas in the Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Region.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek, (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek, (1975). Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek, (1973). On the nature of a creole continuum. Language, 39: 640–69.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Irma. (1970). A syntactic analysis of Sea Island creole (Gullah). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David, (1971a). Introduction: The study of pidgin and creole languages. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press. 1339.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David, (1971b). Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press. 349–70.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Jackson, P. A. (1978a). The status of Gullah: An investigation of convergent processes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Jones-Jackson, P. A., (1978b). Gullah: On the question of Afro-American language. Anthropological Linguistics 20, (9): 422–27.Google Scholar
Jones-Jackson, P. A., (1983). Contemporary Gullah speech: Some persistent linguistic features. Journal of Black Studies, 13: (3): 289303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, P., (1976). Linguistic change in Gullah: Sex, age and mobility. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Rickford, J., (1979). Variation in a creole continuum: Quantitative and implicational approaches. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Stewart, W., (1974). Acculturative processes and the language of the American Negro. In Gage, W. W. (ed), Language in its social setting. Washington, D.C.: The Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Turner, L. D., (1949). Africanisms in the Gullah dialect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar