Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:35:51.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The matter of talk: Political performances in Bhatgaon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Donald Brenneis
Affiliation:
Pitzer College

Abstract

Comparative analysis demonstrates salient stylistic, contextual and content features of two genres of dispute discourse in a Fiji Indian village. Specific strategies of persuasion are examined, as well as explanations for their effectiveness in influencing the course of community conflicts.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, E. M. (1972). Cultural patterning of speech behavior in Burundi. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 72105.Google Scholar
Bailey, F. G. (1969). Political statements. Contributions to Indian Sociology. (New Series) 3, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. (1975). Introduction. In Bloch, M. (ed.), Political language and oratory in traditional society. New York: Academic Press. 128.Google Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1974). Conflict and communication in a Fiji Indian community. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard).Google Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1977a). Strategies of offense choice: malice and mischief in Bhatgaon. MSS.Google Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1977b). Conflict in Bhatgaon: the search for a third party. MSS.Google Scholar
Brenneis, D. & Padarath, R. (1975). ‘About those scoundrels I'll let everyone know’: challenge singing in a Fiji Indian community, JAF 88 (349). 283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, K. (1950). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dundes, A. (1964). Texture, text and context, SFQ 28 (4). 251–65.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. & Schultz, J. (1973). Talking to an ‘us’ or a ‘them’: differences in performing the speech function ‘formulation’ in school counseling interviews. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Frake, C. O. (1963), Litigation in Lipay: a study in Subanun law. In Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Science Congress, Bangkok. Vol. 3 217–22.Google Scholar
Havranek, B. (1964), The functional differentiation of the standard language. In Garvin, P. L. (ed. and trans.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 316.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. (1975), Wolof speech styles and social status. Austin: Working papers in sociolinguistics No. 23.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960), Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. 350–77.Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In Garvin, P. L. (ed. and trans.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 1730.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1973). I have nothing to hide: the language of Ilongot oratory, LinS 2 (2). 593–223.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 3174.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Lg. 50 (4). 696735.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. (1969). Whimperatives. In Sadock, J. & Vanek, A. (eds), Studies presented to Robert B. Lees by his students. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 223–38.Google Scholar
Salmond, A. (1974). Rituals of encounter among the Maori: sociolinguistic study of a scene. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (ed), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 192252.Google Scholar