Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:18:53.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language and revolution: Formulae of the Cultural Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Ji Feng Yuan
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury
Koenraad Kuiper
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury
Shu Shaogu
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury

Abstract

From the hypothesis that routine formulae code cultural norms, it follows that social change will reveal itself in the formulaic inventory of a language. We test this prediction by looking at some of the changes to formulaic speech which took place in postrevolutionary China, particularly during the Chinese Cultural Revolution. We first examine some generally used politeness formulae, comparing them with prerevolutionary equivalents. We then examine the Public Criticism Meeting as a revolutionary ritual and show that its structure and formulaic language arose directly out of revolutionary imperatives. We attribute the changes in the formulaic inventory of Chinese directly to the need to code new social facts, although old social norms can also be discerned in the new formulae, thus showing that social changes are built on a previous social order. (Oral formulaic performance, routine formulae, situational constraints, Cultural Revolution)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, J. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. Report No. 3081. Boston: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1979). On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3:239–66.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1981). Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. (1981). Literacy and literature. In Lloyd, B. & Gay, J. (eds.), Universals of human thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 234–55.Google Scholar
Haggo, D., & Kuiper, K. (1983). Review of F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine. Linguistics 21:531–51.Google Scholar
Haggo, D., (1986). Stock auction speech in Canada and New Zealand. In Berry, R. & Acheson, J. (eds.), Regionalism and national identity: Multidisciplinary essays on Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Christchurch: Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand. 189–97.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K. (in press). New Zealand sporting formulae: Two models of male socialisation. In Cheshire, J. (ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguisticperspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Austin, P. (in press). Race calling as an oral formulaic variety. In Bell, A. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistic research on English in New Zealand. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Haggo, D. (1984). Livestock auctions, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society 13:205–34.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Haggo, D. (1986). The nature of ice hockey commentaries. In Berry, R. & Acheson, J. (eds.), Regionalism and national identity: Multidisciplinary essays on Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Christchurch: Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand. 167–75.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Tan, D. (1989). Cultural congruence and conflict: Acquiring formulae in second language learning. In Garcia, O. & Otheguy, R. (eds.), English across cultures: Cultures across English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 281304.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Tillis, F. (1986). The chant of the tobacco auctioneer. American Speech 60:141–49.Google Scholar
Liang, Heng, & Shapiro, J. (1983). Son of the Revolution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mu, Fu-Sheng (1963). The wilting of the hundred flower: The Chinese intelligensia under Mao. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and native-like fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Communicative competence. London: Longmans, 191225.Google Scholar
Whyte, M. K. (1974). Small groups and political rituals in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar