Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:49:18.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Janet Shibamoto, Japanese women's language. New York: Academic, 1985. Pp. viii + 190.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Pamela Downing
Pamela Downing
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90024
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 278 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M., & de Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society 8: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, P. M. (1983). Interaction: The work women do. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (eds.), Language, gender, and society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. 89–102.Google Scholar
Ide, S., Hori, M., Kawasaki, A., Ikuta, S., & Haga, H. (in press). Sex difference and politeness in Japanese. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.Google Scholar
Inoue, K. (1978). Nihongo no bunpoo kisoku: Nichi-ei taishoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1978). Myopia – A general principle relating to markedness. Paper presented at the ICU Winter Linguistics Seminar, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T., & Harada, S. (1975). Perception of syntactic structure in Japanese. Annual Bulletin RILP 9: 171–92.Google Scholar