Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:58:31.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intimacy of address: friendship markers in children's social play

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Catherine A. Emihovich
Catherine A. Emihovich
Affiliation:
State University College of New York at Buffalo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a preschool children's game is analyzed with reference to patterns of address used by intimates in beginning utterances. The findings reveal that the alternation between real and pretend names functions to mark context shifts in the nature of the activities, and to delineate role relationships among the participants along the dimensions of power and affiliation. It is suggested that variations in how children address one another provide insight into their understanding of a system of social relations. (Peer interaction; developmental sociolinguistics; social behavior, children's address patterns; American English).

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , August 1981 , pp. 189 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boggs, S. and Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1978). Interweaving routines: strategies for encompassing a social situation. Language in Society 7:375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, D. (1978). Discourse intonation I. Discourse Analysis Monographs. English Language Research: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J. and Corsaro, W. A. (1977). Social-ecological constraints on children's communicative strategies. Sociology 11:411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J. and Gumperz, J. J. (1976). Context in children's speech. In Cook-Gumperz, J. and Gumperz, J. J. (eds.). Papers on language and context, working paper 46. Language Behavior Research Laboratory. University of California. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1979). ‘We're friends, right?’: children's use of access rituals in a nursery school. Language in Society 8:315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1971). Sociolinguistics. In Fishman, J. A. (ed), Advances in the sociology of language I. The Hague:: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. and Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1977). Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1980). Surviving as a child: Peer play and talk. Paper presented as Keynote address at the Annual Conference of the Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry,London.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1977a). Play. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1977b). Play with language and speech. In Ervin-Tripp, S. and Mitchell-Keman, C. (eds.), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. P. (1972). Language and social context. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kohl, H. (1972). Names, graffitti and culture. In Kochman, T. (ed.), Rappin' and stylin' out: communication in urban black culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mathiot, M. (1978). Toward a frame of reference for the analysis of face-to-face interaction. Semiotica 24:199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Hymes, D. and Gumperz, J. J. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. and Connolly, K. (1972). Patterns of play and social interaction in preschool children. In Blurton-Jones, N. (ed), Ethological studies of child behavior. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B. (1975). The importance of the story-taker: An investigation of the imaginative life. Urban Review 8:82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). Boundaries. In Herron, R. E. and Sutton-Smith, B. (eds.), Child's play. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar