Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:29:18.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Honorific possession: Power and language in Pohnpei, Micronesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Elizabeth Keating
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, TX [email protected]

Abstract

Mental categorization schemes, such as noun classification systems, can be productive sites for examining how experience is meaningfully and culturally structured through metaphorical and metonymic associations. Pohnpeian possessive classifiers not only constitute cultural categories of rank and power relations, but dynamically re-sort or re-classify these categories through honorific speech. Linguistic and interactional data are here combined with ethnographic data about Pohnpeian society and cultural beliefs, particularly notions about the meaning and construction of ranked social relationships, to show how micro-interactions which index status are linked both to larger cultural ideologies about power and, metaphorically, to the experiential domain. (Pohnpei, Micronesia, honorifics, status, metaphor, possessive constructions)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bascom, William R. (1948). Ponapean prestige economy. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 4:211–21.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent, & Kay, Paul (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight (1965). The atomization of meaning. Language 41:555–73.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen (1987). Politeness. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette (1986), ed. Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Denny, Peter (1976). What are noun classifiers good for? Chicago Linguistic Society 12:122–32.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1994). From grammar to politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, Raymond (1939). Primitive Polynesian economy. London: Routledge. [2nd ed., 1965.]Google Scholar
Fischer, John (1969). Honorific speech and social structure: A comparison of Japanese and Ponapean. Journal of the Polynesian Society 78:417–22.Google Scholar
Fried, Morton (1967). The evolution of political society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul, & Riesenberg, Saul (1952) Respect behavior on Ponape An ethnolinguistic study American Anthropologist 54 201–20Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1986) Prototypes Between Plato and Wittgenstein In Craig, 1986 77102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S P (1988) A plausible history for Micronesian possessive classifiers Oceanic Linguistics 27 6378Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd (1986) The rise of grammatical categories, cognition and language change in Africa BloomingtonAfrican Studies Program, Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Alan, & Earle, Timothy (1987) The evolution of human societies From foraging group to agrarian state Stanford, CAStanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark (1987) The body in the mind The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason ChicagoChicago University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (1994) Power sharing Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia Dissertation, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George (1973) Hedges A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 458508Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things ChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John (1977) Semantics I & II Cambridge & New YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Glenn (1982) One man cannot rule a thousand Ann ArborUniversity of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Pinsker, Eve (1997) Traditional leaders today in the Federated States of Micronesia In White, Geoffrey M & Lindstrom, Lamont (eds), Chiefs today Traditional Pacific leadership and the postcolonial state, to appear Stanford, CAStanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Naomi (1987) Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage In Quinn, Naomi & Holland, Dorothy (eds), Cultural models in language and thought, 173–92 Cambridge & New YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth (1981) Ponapean reference grammar HonoluluUniversity Press of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Riesenberg, Saul (1968) The native polity of Ponape (Smithsonian contributions to anthropology, 10) Washington, DCSmithsonian Institution PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor (1975) Cognitive reference points Cognitive Psychology 7 532–47Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall (1958) Social stratification in Polynesia SeattleUniversity of Washington PressGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, Akitoshi (1982) Chiefdom and the spatial classification of the life-world Everyday life, subsistence and the political system on Ponape In Aoyagi, Machiko (ed), Islanders and their outside world, 153215TokyoSt Paul's (Rikkyo) UniversityGoogle Scholar
Shore, Bradd (1989) Mana and tapu In Howard, Alan & Borofsky, R (eds), Developments in Polynesian ethnology, 137–73 HonoluluUniversity Press of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Wilson, William (1982) Proto-Polynesian possessive marking (Pacific Linguistics, B 85) Canberra Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar