Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:07.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The haves and have nots: Sociolinguistic surveys and the assessment of speaker competence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

John R. Rickford
John R. Rickford
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A central concern in linguistics is assessing the linguistic competence of individuals or groups. Formal linguists usually accomplish this by the study of intuitions with little regard for observed usage, while survey sociolinguists usually depend on observations – especially the data of “spontaneous” interviews – with little regard for intuitions. In this paper I argue that survey sociolinguists need to make greater use of repeated recordings and elicited intuitions.

The existence of this need is illustrated in most detail by an attempt to replicate an earlier implicational analysis of pronominal variation in the Guyanese creole continuum. It is shown that with repeated sampling and the inclusion of elicited intuitions, the discontinuities on which implicational scaling depends disappear almost entirely. With a clearer idea of what speakers can say, however, the sociolinguistic interpretation of what they do say in the spontaneous interviews and recordings is rendered more reliable and revealing.

In the conclusion, some of the theoretical implications and methodological difficulties involved in extending the use of repeated recordings and elicited intuitions in sociolinguistic surveys more generally are discussed. (Sociolinguistic survey methodology, variation, style, implicational scaling, creoles)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 149 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. W. (ed.) (1983). Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. J. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1985). Linguistic intuitions. Paper presented at the Stanford Linguistics Colloquium, 05 28.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1972). The structure of polylectal grammars. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Report of the twentythird annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 17–42.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). On the nature of a creole continuum. Language 49:640–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1975). Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1980). Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Blom, J-P., & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 407–34.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1968). Judgements of grammaticality. Lingua 21:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, W. (1978). Things people know about language that ain't so. In Schmalstieg, W. R. & Magner, T. F. (eds.), Sociolinguistic problems in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia (Folia Slavica 1,3.) Columbus, Ohio: Slavica. 333–42.Google Scholar
Carden, G. (1970). A note on conflicting idiolects. Linguistic Inquiry 1:281–90.Google Scholar
Carden, G. (1973). Dialect variation and abstract syntax. In Shuy, R. (ed.), Some new directions in linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Carden, G., & Dieterich, T. G. (1981). Introspection, observation, and experiment: An example where experiment pays off. In Asquith, P. D. & Giere, R. N. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1980 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, volume 2. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association. 583–97.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. M., Bever, T. G., & Pollack, C. R. (1981). The nonuniqueness of linguistic intuitions. Language 57:368–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, F. G. (1961). Jamaica talk. Kingston: Institute of Jamaica, and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (1981). The social differentiation of functional language use: A sociolinguistic investigation of travel agency talk. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:49–70.Google Scholar
De Camp, D. (1971). Toward a generative analysis of a post-Creole speech continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 349–70.Google Scholar
Douglas-Cowie, E. (1978). Linguistic code-switching in a Northern Irish village: Social interaction and social ambition. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold. 37–51.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. F. (1983). Code selection and shifting in Guyana. Language in Society 12:295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escure, G. (1981). Decreolization in a creole continuum: Belize. In Highfield, A. & Valdman, A. (eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies. Ann Arbor: Karoma. 27–39.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (1979). Language shift. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Gilman, C. (1982). Pidgins as performance, competence, and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 38:19–30.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselmo, N. (1970). Code-switching and modes of speaking. In Gilbert, G. G. (ed.), Texas studies in bilingualism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co. 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Why linguistics needs the sociologist. Social Research 34:632–42.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). The scope of sociolinguistics. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Current trends and prospects. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 313–33.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1973). Toward linguistic competence. Texas Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 16.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1:97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1975). What is a linguistic fact? (PdR Press Publications in Linguistics, 1.) Lisse: Peter de Ridder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? A response to Beatriz Lavandera. Sociolinguistics Working Paper 44. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, Tex.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1980). Is there a creole speech community? In Valdman, A. & Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies. New York: Academic. 369–88.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288. Vols. 1 and 2. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Page, R. B. (1980). Theoretical aspects of sociolinguistic studies in pidgin and creole languages. In Valdman, A. & Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies. New York: Academic. 331–67.Google Scholar
Le Page, R. B., & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loflin, M. (1970). On the structure of the verb in a dialect of American Negro English. Linguistics 59:14–28.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1981). The rise and fall of the vernacular. Manuscript, Pitzer College.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1982). Chattering, nattering and blethering: Informal interviews as speech events. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1979). Review of R. K. S. Macaulay, Language, social class and education: A Glasgow study. In Language in Society 8:88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1984). What a performance! Some problems with the competence-performance distinction. Sheffield Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, I. School of Modern Languages, University of Sheffield. 40–55.Google Scholar
Pavone, J. (1980). Implicational scales and English dialectology. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1975). Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of BE BIN. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 162–83.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1979). Variation in a creole continuum: Quantitative and implicational approaches. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1980). Analyzing variation in creole languages. In Valdman, A. & Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies. New York: Academic. 165–84.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1983). What happens in decreolization. In Andersen, R. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. 298–319.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1987). Dimensions of a creole continuum. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (in press). Decreolization paths for Guyanese singular pronouns. In Gilbert, G. (ed.), Pidgin and creole languages: Essays in honor of John E. Reinecke. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (in preparation). Linguistic variation and the social order. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1980). The relative clause marker in Scots English: Diffusion, complexity and style as dimensions of syntactic change. Language in Society 9:221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1981). On the problem of syntactic variation: A reply to Beatriz Lavandera and William Labov. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 82.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, E., & Romaine, S. (1985). Some questions for the definition of “style” in sociohistorical linguistics. In Romaine, S. & Traugott, E. (eds.), Papers from the workshop on sociohistorical linguistics. Folia Linguistica Historica.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Broeck, J. (1977). Class differences in syntactic complexity in the Flemish town of Maaseik. Language in Society 6:149–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Winford, D. (1985). The concept of “diglossia” in Caribbean creole situations. Language in Society 14:345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W., & Fasold, R. W. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1976). Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5:189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1982). The conversational historical present in American English narrative. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H. (1984). The wave model of linguistic change and the naturalness of interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6:160–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar