We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Gregory M. Matoesian, Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. Pp. vii, 256. Hb $40.00, Pb $15.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
19 February 2009
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Boden, Deirdre, & Zimmerman, Don H. (1991), eds. Talk and social structure. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1985). Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction. In van Dijk, Teun (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3, 133–48. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyers and witnesses in court examinations. In Levi, Judith N. & Walker, Anne G. (eds.), Language in the judicial process, 39–64. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Drew, & Heritage, (eds.), 470–520.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, & Heritage, John (1992), eds. Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987). Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In Alexander, Jeffrey C. et al. (eds.), The micro-macro link, 207–34. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar