Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:35:09.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Jennifer Sclafani
Jennifer Sclafani*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics 1421 37th Street NW, Washington DC 20057, USA Hellenic American University, Department of Applied Linguistics Massalias 22, Athens 10680, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the construction of political identity in the 2011–2012 US Republican presidential primary debates. Focusing on candidates’ self-introductions, I analyze how candidates use references to family members and roles to frame their political identities or ‘presidential selves’. Family references are shown to (i) frame candidates’ personal identities as family men/women; (ii) interweave the spheres of home and politics and consequently, their private and public selves; (iii) serve as a tool of discursive one-upmanship in self-introduction sequences; and (iv) demonstrate intimate familiarity and expertise on the topic of national security. This study extends research on family discourse and identity by examining the rhetorical function of mentioning family-related identities in explicitly persuasive public discourse, and contributes to sociolinguistic research on political discourse by examining how family identities serve as a resource for framing political identities. (Discourse analysis, framing, family, identity, political discourse, presidential debates, sequentiality)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 369 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aylor, Brooks (1999). Source credibility and presidential candidates in 1996: The changing nature of character and empathy evaluations. Communication Research Reports 16:296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, trans. by McGee, Vern W., 60–102. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Christina S. (1996). ‘I've got some points I'd like to make here’: The achievement of social face through turn management during the 1992 vice presidential debate. Political Communication 13:166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L., & Wells, William T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7:585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society 30:403–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey, William O.; Hinck;, Edward A. & Hinck, Shelly S. (2008). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debates from 1960 to 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (2006). Narrating the political self in a campaign for US Congress. Language in Society 35:467–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2002). ‘I'm Mommy and you're Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language in Society 31:679–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia; Tannen, Deborah; & Sacknovitz, Aliza (2007). A working father: One man's talk about parenting at work. In Tannen, Deborah, Kendall, Shari, & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.), Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families, 195–233. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Trans. by Burger, Thomas & Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.) (2004). Presidential candidate images. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen H., & Waldman, Paul (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (1999). The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 29–52. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Shari (1999). The interpenetration of (gendered) spheres: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of a mother at work and at home. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari (2006). Positioning the female voice within work and family. In Baxter, Judith (ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts, 179–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1967/1980). Word, dialogue and novel. In Kristeva, Julia, Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, ed. by Roudiez, Leon S., trans. by Gora, Thomas & Jardine, Alice, 64–91. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael (2009). On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in US electoral politics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture 11:241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael, & Silverstein, Michael (2012). Creatures of politics: Media, message and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Allan, & McCauliff, Kristen (2004). The ‘authentic candidate’: Extending candidate image assessment. In Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.), Presidential candidate images, 85–102. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mayo, Edith P. (2000). Party politics: The political impact of the first ladies’ social role. The Social Science Journal 37:577–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H.; Wattenberg, Martin P.; & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. The American Political Science Review 80(2):521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg (2006). ‘Where are you from?’: Identifying place. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:320–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen (1981). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Romm, Joseph J. (1993). Defining national security: The nonmilitary aspects. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santorum, Rick (2006). It takes a family: Conservatism and the common good. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1977). Opening encounters. American Sociological Review 424:671–91.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13:311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1993). ‘Speaking for another’ in sociolinguistic interviews. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 231–59. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: The sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society 25:167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (2002). Mother and friends in a Holocaust life story. Language in Society 31:309–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Patrick A. (2012). Debatable humor: Laughing matters on the 2008 presidential primary campaign. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1994). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. Gender and discourse, 19–52. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah; Kendall, Shari; & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.) (2007). Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 57–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teven, Jason J. (2008). An examination of perceived credibility of the 2008 presidential candidates: Relationships with believability, likeability, and deceptiveness. Human Communication 11:391–408.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert P. (ed.) (2004). Life in the White House: A social history of the first family and the president's house. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar