Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:37:54.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Don't go on my property!”: A case study of transactions of user rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Rhianon Allen
Rhianon Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two hours of conversation among three children were examined for oral disputes concerning use of beds in their bedroom. Examination of transcript segments revealed that the children signaled a social order governing use of property and objects. The children were found to negotiate such use on an ongoing basis, and the form and content of the disputes differed dramatically according to whether the beds were being claimed for the purpose of play or sleep. The conversations reflected the ongoing construction and negotiation of social representations, within shared frames or finite provinces of meaning, for use of space and objects. (Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, property, ownership)

Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 349 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakeman, Roger, & Brownlee, John R. (1982). Social rules governing object conflicts in toddlers and preschoolers. In Rubin, Kenneth H. & Ross, Hildy S. (eds.), Peer relationships and social skills in childhood, 99–111. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald, & Lein, Laura (1977). “You fruithead”: A sociolinguistic approach to children's dispute settlement. InErvin-Tripp, Susan & Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.), Child discourse, 49–65. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott, & Taebel, Del (1978). The economic socialization of children: A neo-Marxist analysis. Social Problems 26: 198–210.Google Scholar
Dawe, Helen C. (1934). An analysis of two hundred quarrels of preschool children. Child Development 5: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, John C. (1942). Attitudes towards property: A genetic study by the paired-comparisons rating of offenses. Journal of Genetic Psychology 60: 3–35.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Nancy; Bartlett, Kim; & Haake, Robert (1983). The effects of nonverbal cues concerning possession of a toy on children's proprietary and sharing behaviors. Journal of Genetic Psychology 143: 79–85.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Nancy; Haake, Robert J.; & Bartlett, Kim (1981). The effects of possession and ownership on the sharing and proprietary behaviors of preschool children. Merrill Palmer Quarterly 27: 61–68.Google Scholar
Furby, Lita (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality 6: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gearhart, Maryl (1983). Social plans and social episodes: The development of collaboration in role play. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 657–77.Google Scholar
James, William (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt [Reprinted, New York: Dover, 1950.].Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar (1985). Brogez: Ritual and strategy in Israel's children's conflicts. Language in Society 14: 467–90.Google Scholar
Labov, Teresa (1982). Social structure and peer terminology in a Black adolescent gang. Language in Society 11: 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. (1985). On the functions of social conflict among children American Sociological Review 50: 207–23.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh (1983). The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making. Language in Society 12: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1993). Common and uncommon ground: Social and structural factors in codeswitching. Language in Society 22: 475–503.Google Scholar
Newman, Denis (1978). Ownership and permission among nursery school children. In Glick, Joseph & Clarke-Stewart, K. Alison (eds.), The development of social understanding, 213–49. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
Newman, Oscar (1975). Design guidelines for creating defensible space. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Opie, Iona, & Opie, Peter (1959). The lore and language of school children. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph (1841) Qu'est ce que la proprīété? Paris: Ganier. [Trans: What is property? An enquiry into the principle of right and of government, trans, by Benjamin R. Tucker. New York: Fertig, 1966.]Google Scholar
Ramsey, Patricia (1987). Possession episodes in young children's social interactions. Journal of Genetic Psychology 148: 315–25.Google Scholar
Resnick, Lauren B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In Resnick, Lauren B. et al. (eds.), Perspectives in social shared cognition, 1–20. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar (MS). The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. Undated, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Saenz, Terry I. (1992). Strategies for obtaining toys at Head Start. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Snare, Francis (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly 9: 200–206.Google Scholar