Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:53:42.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conversational agreement and racial formation processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

VALENTINA PAGLIAI*
Affiliation:
Remarque Institute at New York University, 52 Washington Square South, Third Floor, New York, NY 10012, [email protected]

Abstract

Recent scholarship on the working of racial formation processes underscores the intersection between discursive and structural components in the emergence of “race,” and the agency of individuals at the local and global level in articulating its meaning. This article offers a link toward understanding how racial formation processes operate in face-to-face interaction, by highlighting how people do racialization. Based on fieldwork in Italy, it explores how conversationalists deploy agreement to co-construct a racialized image of immigrants to Italy. It is argued that this deployment leads to reinforcement of the racist stances expressed in the conversation itself, and possibly beyond it. In addition, the repeated occurrence of agreement during the co-construction of utterances produces a spiral effect around racializing discourse, a progressive deepening of the racialization itself. At the same time, agreement leads to a decrease of personal responsibility for the statements made, which come to be co-constructed among conversationalists. (Agreement, racialization, immigration, Italy)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allievi, Stefano (2002). Muslims in Italy. In Leveau, Rémy, Mohsen-Finan, Khadija & de Wenden, Catherine Wihtol (eds.), New European identity and citizenship, 37–47. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Heritage, John (eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne, & Wallerstein, Immanuel (1991). Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Barot, Rohit, & Bird, John (2001). Racialization: The genealogy and critique of a concept. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24:601–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, Richard (1977). Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard (1986). Story, performance and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumann, Gerd (1996). Contesting culture: Discourses of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., & Luckman, Thomas (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack (1988). The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 17:161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997a). Gender is burning: Questions of appropriation and subversion. In McClintock, Anne, Mufti, Aamir & Shohat, Ella (eds.), Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, & postcolonial perspectives, 381–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In Conboy, Katie, Medina, Nadia & Stanbury, Sarah (eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. A gender and culture reader, 401–17. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997c). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (2001). Working with spoken discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cesareo, Vincenzo (2004). Migrazioni 2003: Un quadro di insieme e un’agenda per il futuro. In Fondazione ISMU (ed.), Nono rapporto sulle migrazioni 2003, 17–38. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight (1988). Health theatre in a Hmong refugee camp: Performance, communication, and culture. TDR 32:174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1992). Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In Auer, Peter & di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The contextualization of language, 337–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essed, Philomena J. M. (1991). Understanding everyday racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fortman, Bas de Gaay (2002). Racism and poverty in a human rights perspective. In Foundation, Events (ed.), Europe’s new racism? Causes, manifestations, and solutions. New York & Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and The discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul (2004). Foreword: Migrancy, culture, and a new map of Europe. In Raphael-Hernandez, Heike (ed.), Blackening Europe: The African American presence, xi–xxii. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18:213–31.Google Scholar
Goldberg, David T. (2002). The racial state. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Granata, Elena; Lanzani, Arturo; & Novak, Christian (2004). Abitare e insediarsi. In Fondazione ISMU (ed.), Nono rapporto sulle migrazioni 2003, 161–77. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Grant-Thomas, Andrew, & Powell, John A. (2006). Toward a structural racism framework. Poverty & Race 15:3–6.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (2006). Preference, pre-sequence and the timing of social solidarity. In Drew, Paul & Heritage, John (eds.), Conversation analysis: Volume II. Sequence organization, 11–26. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (1998). Language, race, and White public space. American Anthropologist 100:680–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1981). “In vain I tried to tell you”: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISTAT (2006). Istituto Nazionale di Statistica Italiano. http://www.demo.istat.it/Google Scholar
ISTAT (2001). Istituto Nazionale di Statistica Italiano. http://www.demo.istat.it/Google Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena (1996). Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 26:291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentin, Alana (2004). Racism and anti-racism in Europe. London & Ann Arbor: Pluto.Google Scholar
Macioti, Maria I., & Pugliese, Enrico (2003). L’esperienza migratoria: Immigrati e rifugiati in Italia. Rome & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Miles, Robert (1989). Racism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, Frank E. (1996). Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers: Prosodic aspects of recipiency. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 131–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murji, Karim, & Solomos, John (eds.) (2005). Racialization: Studies in theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, & Winant, Howard (1986). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Papavero, Giorgia (2004). Allegato statistico: L’immigrazione in cifre. In Fondazione ISMU (ed.), Nono rapporto sulle migrazioni 2003, 355–76. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (2006). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Drew, Paul & Heritage, John (eds.), Conversation analysis: Volume II. Sequence organization, 45–88. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Räthzel, Nora (2002). Development in theories of racism. In Foundation, Evens (ed.), Europe’s new racism: Causes, manifestations and solutions, 3–26. New York & Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Rattansi, Ali (2007). Racism: A very short introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1971). Lectures (May 24, SS 158 Y). Ms., University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary.’ In Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 413–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (2006). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Drew, Paul & Heritage, John (eds.), Conversation analysis: Volume II. Sequence organization, 27–43. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphors in US public discourse. Discourse and Society 10:191–224.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.; Jefferson, Gail; & Sacks, Harvey (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:361–82.Google Scholar
Shuck, Gail (2004). Conversational performance and the poetic construction of an ideology. Language in Society 33:195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Maxim (1992). Deconstructing the nation: Immigration, racism and citizenship in modern France. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stolcke, Verena (1993). Is sex to gender as race is to ethnicity? In Valle, Teresa del (ed.), Gendered anthropology, 17–37. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stolcke, Verena (1995). Talking culture: New boundaries, new rhetorics of exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology 36:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-Andre (1987). La force du préjugé. Paris: La Decouverte.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor (1967). The forest of symbols. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, Bonnie (1996). Exposing prejudice: Puerto Rican experiences of language, race, and class. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Winant, Howard (2000). Race and race theory. Annual Review of Sociology 26:169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.) (1989). Language, power and ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar