Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:49:27.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's linguistic choices: Audience design and societal norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Valerie Youssef
Valerie Youssef
Affiliation:
Department of Languages & Linguistics, University of the West IndiesSt. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago, West Indies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To reexamine the explanation of stylistic variation given by Bell 1984, this article considers Bell's audience design factors in relation to those associated with the domains described by Fishman 1972. Data collected longitudinally from three preschool children in the Trinidad sociolinguistic complex were examined for variation in production of Trinidad Creole and Standard English verb forms. All three children exhibited stylistic variation; but the nature of the variation shed further light on audience design, since audience factors sometimes remained constant, while speech patterns exhibited variation. It appears that the demands of the wider Trinidadian society (in particular for children), along with the education system, interact with familial demands to impose social/psychological constraints which impinge on and modify audience design. In addition, an implicational scaling of response to addressee, auditor, overhearer, and eavesdropper cannot be unequivocally adopted, since response to audience may vary according to the personal significance which individuals in a given setting have for the child-speaker. (Child language acquisition, creole studies, Trinidad)

Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 257 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beebe, Leslie (1981). Social and situational factors affecting communicative strategy of dialect code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 32:139–49.Google Scholar
Bell, Allen (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, Lawrence D. (1981). Talkin good – A case of strained speech. Mimeo, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work setting. Language in Society 9:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:49–70.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv (1988). The speech of British Black women in Dudley, West Midlands. In Coates, J. & Cameron, D. (eds.), Women in their speech communities. London: Longman. 33–50.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua (1972). The relationship between micro- and macro-sociolinguistics in the study of who speaks what language to whom and when. In Pride, John B. & Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 15–32.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, & Smith, F. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Giles, Howard & St. Clair, Robert (eds.), Language & social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. 45–65.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jahangiri, Nader, & Hudson, Richard A. (1982). Patterns of variation in Tehrani Persian. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Arnold. 49–63.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). The study of language in its social context. In his Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 183–259.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1980). Is there a creole speech community? In Valdman, Albert & Highfield, Arnold (eds.), Theoretical orientations in Creole studies. New York: Academic. 369–89.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, & Borders, Denise (1987). Language diversity and classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal 24:119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, April (1984). Code-switching Hawaiian style: Children's accommodation along a decre-olizing continuum. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:71–86.Google Scholar
Rickford, John (1979). Variation in a Creole continuum: Quantitative and implicational approaches. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald (1972). A sociolinguistic description of two communities in Trinidad. Dissertation, University of York, England.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald (1978). Phonological hypercorrection in the process of decreolisation: The case of Trinidadian English. Journal of Linguistics 14:227–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald (1980). The Creole situation in the context of sociolinguistic studies. In Day, Richard (ed.), Issues in English Creoles. Heidelberg: Groos. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald (1988). The Creole continuum and the notion of the speech community as the locus of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 71:91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, Valerie (1990). The development of linguistic skills in Trinidadian children: An integrative approach to verb phrase development. Dissertation, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine.Google Scholar
Youssef, Valerie (1991a). The acquisition of varilingual competence. English World Wide 12:87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, Valerie (1991b). Can I put – I want a slippers to put on: Young children's development of request forms in a code-switching environment. Journal of Child Language 18:609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, Valerie (1991c). Variation as a feature of language acquisition in the Trinidad context. Language Variation and Change 3:75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar