We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Ferguson, C. A., & DeBose, C. E. (1977). Simplified registers, broken language, and pidginization. In Valdman, A. (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 99–128.Google Scholar
Highfield, A., & Valdman, A. (eds.). (1981). Historicily and variation in creole studies. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. (1980). Continuity of transmission and genetic relationship. In Traugott, E. C. et al. (eds.), Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 27–35.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. (1981). Chinook Jargon in areal and historical context. In Mattina, A. & Montler, T. (eds.), The working papers of the XVI International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages. Missoula: University of Montana. 295–396.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. (forthcoming). Are there linguistic prerequisites for contact-induced language change? In Geoghegan, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium: Language Contact.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. (1975). Toward an adequate theory of creolization. Paper presented at the 1975 International Conference on Pidgins and Creoles. Honolulu.Google Scholar