Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:51:18.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pius ten Hacken (Ed.), The Semantics of Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. 264. ISBN 978-1-107-09970-8

Review products

Pius ten Hacken (Ed.), The Semantics of Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. 264. ISBN 978-1-107-09970-8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

MARTIN SCHAEFER
MARTIN SCHAEFER*
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 701 - 706
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Grzega, J. (2009). Compounding from an onomasiological perspective. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 217–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2009). Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 105–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2010). The ecology of English noun–noun compounds. In Meaning and the lexicon: the parallel architecture 1975–2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2009). A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 79–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (eds.) (2009). The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, I., & Aronoff, M. (2011). Review of The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Language, 87(3), 643–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M., & Mellenius, I. (2018). Children’s novel NN compounding in Swedish diary data: function and form. Morphology, 28(3), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, S., & Bisetto, A. (2009). The classification of compounds. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 34–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Štekauer, P. (2009). Meaning predictability of novel context-free compounds. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 272–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar