Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:12:58.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving yet being still: exploring source domain reversal and force in explanations of enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

PETER RICHARDSON Open the ORCID record for PETER RICHARDSON [Opens in a new window]  and
CHARLES M. MUELLER
PETER RICHARDSON
Affiliation:
Hokkaido University, Research Faculty of Media and Communication
CHARLES M. MUELLER
Affiliation:
Fuji Women’s University, Department of English Language and Culture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Buddhist and Hindu discourse often juxtapose statements about the inexpressibility of ultimate reality with descriptions drawing on metaphor and paradox. This raises the question of how particular types of metaphor fulfill the role of expressing what is believed to be inexpressible. The current study employs a cognitive linguistic framework to examine how modern Buddhist and Hindu religious teachers use metaphor to talk about enlightenment. Adopting a usage-based approach focusing on how figurative language is recontexualized by the same speaker within a stretch of discourse, the study identifies a recurrent pattern within the discourse on enlightenment that consists of four elements. The first is source domain reversal, which we define as a speaker making use of a particular source domain to refer to a target, and then later, in the same discourse segment, using a source domain with a seemingly opposite meaning to refer to the same target. The other three involve a movement from force to object-based schemas, from the perceived revelation of more conventional to deeper truths, and from description of a process to description of a state. We conclude by briefly discussing our findings within the context of research on apophatic discourse in other religions.

Keywords

cognitive linguisticsmetaphorforce dynamicsreligionenlightenment
Type
Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 2: Special Issue on Iconicity , June 2019 , pp. 310 - 339
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to general editor Jeannette Littlemore who handled the submission, and to the two reviewers. The speed and quality of the submission and review process was astonishing. Funding for this research was provided by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI-16KT008306).

References

online sources

Sadhuguru, . Sadhuguru – what is enlightenment and how to get there. Online <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbVP11csZiY>..>Google Scholar
Spira, Rupert. What is enlightenment? Online <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrulfc_ru7Y>..>Google Scholar
Yeon, Bon. Zen Master Bon Yeon on what enlightenment really means. Online <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jgb6uGwcrI>..>Google Scholar
Yuttadhammo, (Bhikkhu). Enlightenment. Online <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKX17FpQUaQ>..>Google Scholar

references

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D. & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 11(3), 230–241.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2011). Metaphor and reconciliation: the discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2016). Mixed metaphors from a discourse dynamics perspective: A non-issue? In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 17–30). Amersterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2017). Fire metaphors: discourses of awe and authority. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Federman, A. (2009). Literal means and hidden meanings: a new analysis of skillful means. Philosophy East and West 59(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyaerts, K. & Boeve, L. (2018). Religious metaphors at the crossroads between apophatical theology and cognitive linguistics: an interdisciplinary study. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. 52–88). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gao, X. & Lan, C. (2018). Buddhist metaphors in the Diamond Sutra and the Heart Sutra. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. 229–262). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor in media language and cognition: a perspective from Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Lege Artis: Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow 3(1), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewski, H. (2018). Snakes, leaves, and poisoned arrows: metaphors of emotion in early Buddhism. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. 210–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lan, C. (2012). A cognitive perspective on the metaphors in the Buddhist sutra ‘Bao Ji Jing’. Metaphor and the Social World 2(2), 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L. W.-l., & Chiang, W.-y. (2007). Emptiness we live by: metaphors and paradoxes in Buddhism’s Heart Sutra. Metaphor and Symbol 22(4), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. C. (2013). Moksha and the Hindu worldview. Psychology and Developing Societies 25(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ñāṇamoli, B. & Bodhi, B. (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2014). Antagonism on YouTube: metaphor in online discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2018). Hey YouTube! Positioning the viewer in vlogs. In Nørgaard, N. & Busse, B. (eds.), Rethinking language, text and context (pp. 254–265). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. (2012). A closer walk: a study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World 2(2), 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. (2017). An investigation of the blocking and development of empathy in discussions between Muslim and Christian believers. Metaphor and the Social World 7(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. & Nagashima, M. (2018). Perceptions of danger and co-occurring metaphors in Buddhist dhamma talks and Christian sermons. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5(1), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, H. P. (2018). The self in Hindu philosophies of liberation. In Fernando, S. & Moodley, R. (eds.), Global psychologies: mental health and the global south (pp. 99–118). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3), 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4), 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sells, M. A. (1994). Mystical languages of unsaying. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Deignan, A. & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre, and recontexualization. Metaphor and Symbol 28(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre-López, A. J. (2016). The discourse of mindfulness: what language reveals about the mindfulness experience. In Ordóñez-López, P. & Edo-Marzá, N. (eds.), New insights into the analysis of medical discourse in professional, academic and popular settings (pp. 173–198). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Silvestre-López, A. J. (2019). Deliberate metaphors in Buddhist teachings about meditation. In Navarro, I. (ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 205–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre-López, A. J. & Navarro i Ferrando, I. (2017). Metaphors in the conceptualisation of meditative practices. Metaphor and the Social World 7(1), 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Unno, T. (2002). Shin Buddhism: bits of rubble turn into gold. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar