Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:49:44.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Edna Andrews, Neuroscience and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. xiv + 254 pp. ISBN 978-1-107-03655-0

Review products

Edna Andrews, Neuroscience and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. xiv + 254 pp. ISBN 978-1-107-03655-0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

ADOLFO M. GARCÍA
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Faculty of Education, National University of Cuyo (UNCuyo), Mendoza, Argentina E-mail: [email protected]
EDINSON MUÑOZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Lingüística y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Bialystok, E., Abutalebi, J., Bak, T. H., Burke, D. M., & Kroll, J. F. (2016). Aging in two languages: implications for public health. Ageing Research Reviews, 27, 5660.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240250.Google Scholar
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: an empirical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 3147.Google Scholar
Calvo, N., García, A. M., Manoiloff, L., & Ibáñez, A. (2015). Bilingualism and cognitive reserve: a critical overview and a plea for methodological innovations. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 249.Google Scholar
Ferré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., & Guasch, M. (2006). Can a horse be a donkey? Semantic and form interference effects in translation recognition in early and late proficient and nonproficient Spanish–Catalan bilinguals. Language Learning, 56(4), 571608.Google Scholar
García, A. M. (2015a). Translating with an injured brain: neurolinguistic aspects of translation as revealed by bilinguals with cerebral lesions. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 60(1), 112134.Google Scholar
García, A. M. (2015b). Psycholinguistic explorations of lexical translation equivalents: thirty years of research and their implications for cognitive translatology. Translation Spaces, 4(1), 928.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1994). Individual bilingualism. In Asher, R. E. (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 16561660). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2013). Bilingualism: a short introduction. In Grosjean, F. and Li, P. (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 526). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: a critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373381.Google Scholar
Moreno, E. M., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2008). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the study of bilingual language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 477508.Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2016). Should the search for bilingual advantages in executive functioning continue? Cortex, 74, 305314.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381398.Google Scholar