Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:58:58.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructions of contrast in spoken testimonials on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

JENNY HARTMAN
JENNY HARTMAN*
Affiliation:
Lund University
*
†e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spoken testimonials on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) constitute the data for this study, which considers contrastive construal as evoked by conditional constructions (if, unless, what if) and antonymous uses of lexical items (bad–good, guilt–innocence). Unlike conditional language use for the expression of hypothetical scenarios, doubt, and catastrophizing, antonyms have not been a focus of OCD research. In the data, antonymous lexical items establish experiential dichotomies (e.g., good–bad, guilt–innocence, cause–prevent) that reinforce and specify the nature of evoked contrast. Meaning making in the data, it is proposed, evokes contrastive construal according to bundles of integrated quality dimensions such as modality, morality, and emotion that make up incompatible conceptions of reality. Tied to contrast in the data is also the notion of balance, and contrast is considered alongside force-dynamic actions that are experienced as effecting balance. While the overriding concerns for the study are linguistic–conceptual, the study’s findings can have implications for research on OCD and a cognitive semantic perspective can potentially complement both content- and process-oriented psychological approaches to this disorder.

Keywords

conditional constructionsantonymscontrastive construalObsessive Compulsive Disorder
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 83 - 109
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Paul Chilton and Carita Paradis for valuable input on this paper. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for feedback and suggestions. This research has been carried out as part of a project funded by The Crafoord Foundation and The Torsten Söderberg Foundation.

References

references

Abramowitz, J. S. (2006). Understanding and treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Cognitive-Behavioral approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, J. S., & Jacoby, R. J. (2014). Obsessive Compulsive Disorder in the DSM-5. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21(3), 221–235.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
AoIR (Association of Internet Research) (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Online: <https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Berger, I. (2012). YouTube as a source of data. PsyPAG Quarterly, 83, 9–12.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. H., Landeros-Weisenberger, A., Rosario, M. C., Pittenger, C., & Leckman, J. F. (2008). Meta-analysis of the symptom structure of obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1532–1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Calamari, J. E., Wiegartz, P. S., Riemann, B. C., Cohen, R. J., Greer, A., Jacobi, D. M., Jahn, S. C., & Carmin, C. (2004). Obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: an attempted replication and extension of a symptom-based taxonomy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 647–670.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2005). Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift: toward a Discourse Space Theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 78–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2014). Language, space and mind: the conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. (2002). Mental space embeddings, counterfactuality, and the use of unless . English Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 347–377.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental Spaces in grammar: conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerk, R., & Reed, S. (2001). Conditionals: a comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, D., & Liberato, A. S. Q. (2007). Learning to live with OCD: labeling, the self, and stigma. Deviant Behavior, 28(4), 305–331.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning: semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, J. (2017). Premonitory sensations and Touretting volcanoes: force construal in personal narratives on Tourette Syndrome. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 155–183.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2012). Antonyms in English: construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilgariff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX 1, 7–36. Online: <http://www.sketchengine.co.uk>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapton, O. (2016a). Experiences of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): activity, state and object episodes. Qualitative Health Research, 26(14), 2009–2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapton, O. (2016b). Dynamic conceptualizations of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Language and Cognition, 8, 1–31.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, D. M., Abramowitz, J. S., Calamari, J. E., Kyrios, M., Radomsky, A. S., Sookman, D., Taylor, S., & Wilhelm, S. (2004). A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 283–313.Google Scholar
Murphy, H., & Perera-Delcourt, R. (2014). ‘Learning to live with OCD is a little mantra I often repeat’: understanding the lived experience of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the contemporary therapeutic context. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 87, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. M. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikodijevic, A., Moulding, R., Anglim, J., Aardema, F., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2015). Fear of self, doubt and obsessive compulsive symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 49, 164–172.Google Scholar
OCCWG (Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group) (1997). Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 667–681.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K. (2002). Intrusions and inferences in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, K., Aardema, F., & Pélissier, M.-C. (2005). Beyond reasonable doubt: reasoning processes in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and related disorders. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K., Koszegi, N., Aardema, F., van Niekerk, J., & Taillon, A. (2009). An Inference-Based Approach to treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16, 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, S. A. (1999). Living with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case study of a woman’s construction of self. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 12(1), 73–86.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (2005). Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes, 15, 541–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. (2008). Configurations, construals and change: expressions of degree . English Language and Linguistics, 12, 317–343.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (2015). Meanings of words: theory and application. In Haß, U. & Storjohann, P. (Eds.), Handbuch Wort und Wortschatz 3 (pp. 274–293). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., Löhndorf, S., van de Weijer, J., & Willners, C. (2015) Semantic profiles of antonymic adjectives in discourse. Linguistics, 53(1), 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. & Willners, C. (2011). Antonymy: from conventionalization to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 367–391.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. (1993). Obsessions, responsibility and guilt. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachman, S., & de Silva, P. (1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: a cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 571–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkovskis, P. M. (1989). Cognitive-behavioural factors in the persistence of intrusive thoughts in obsessional problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 677–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafran, R. (2005). Cognitive-Behavioral Models of OCD. In Abramowitz, J. S. & Houts, A. C. (Eds.), Concepts and controversies in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (pp. 229–255). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Shafran, R., Watkins, E., & Charman, T. (1996). Guilt in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 509−516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sookman, D., & Steketee, G. (2007). Directions in specialized Cognitive Behavior Therapy for resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: theory and practice of two approaches. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14, 1–17.Google Scholar
Sveriges Riksdag [Swedish Parliament] (1998). Personuppgiftslag [Personal Data Act] (SFS 1998: 204). Online in English: <http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/se/se097en.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. (2002). Cognition in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: an overview. In Frost, R. O. & Steketee, G. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tilghman-Osborne, C., Cole, D. A., & Felton, J. W. (2010). Definition and measurement of guilt: implications for clinical research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 536–546.Google Scholar
Van Schalkwyk, G. I., Bhalla, I. P., Griepp, M., Kelmendi, B., Davidson, L., & Pittenger, C. (2016). Toward understanding the heterogeneity of obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from narratives in adult patients. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 50(1), 74–81.Google Scholar