Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:01:29.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An S-shaped pattern in the perceived passage of time: how social interaction governs temporal experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

MICHAEL G. FLAHERTY
MICHAEL G. FLAHERTY*
Affiliation:
Eckerd College
*
†Address for correspondence: Michael G. Flaherty, Department of Sociology, Eckerd College, 4200 54th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, FL, 33711; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variation in the passage of time is perceived against the backdrop of standard temporal units. Under certain conditions, we perceive time to be passing slowly. In other settings, our subjective temporal experience is roughly synchronized with the objective time of clocks or calendars. And given different circumstances, we perceive time to have passed quickly. Drawing from 740 narratives that depict distortion in the perceived passage of time, I formulate a theory that accounts for the full range of variation in temporal experience. This theory can be represented by an S-shaped figure. According to this theory, variation in the perceived passage of time reflects variation in the density of experience per standard temporal unit. In turn, the density of experience per standard temporal unit is conditioned by the dynamics of social interaction. In its original form, however, this theory assumes that one’s circumstances shape one’s temporal experience in deterministic fashion. Consequently, based upon interviews with 406 disparate people, I conceptualize time work (or temporal agency) as one’s efforts to control, manipulate, or customize one’s own temporal experience or that of others. I conclude with some directions for future research.

Keywords

timetemporal experiencesocial interactiontime workagency
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 25
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Vyvyan Evans and Chris Sinha for the opportunity to contribute to this special issue.

References

references

Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1981). Nam: the Vietnam War in the words of the men and women who fought there. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Bluedorn, A. C., & Standifer, R. L. (2006). Time and the temporal imagination. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 196–206.Google Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1953). Concepts of time among the Tiv of Nigeria. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 9, 251–262.Google Scholar
Cheek, F. E., & Laucius, J. (1971). The time worlds of three drug-using groups – alcoholics, heroin addicts, and psychedelics. In Yaker, H., Osmond, H., & Cheek, F. (Eds.), The future of time: man’s temporal environment (pp. 330–350). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Dalsgård, A. L., Frederiksen, M. D., Højlund, S., & Meinert, L. (Eds.) (2014). Ethnographies of youth and temporality: time objectified. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. S. (1983). Smut: erotic reality/obscene ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1971). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. Social Forces, 50, 166–182.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1965 [1915]). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G. (1991). The perception of time and situated engrossment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 76–85.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G. (1999). A watched pot: how we experience time. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G. (2003). Time work: customizing temporal experience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 17–33.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G. (2011). The textures of time: agency and temporal experience. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G., Freidin, B., & Sautu, R. (2005). Variation in the perceived passage of time: a cross-national study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 400–410.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. G., & Meer, M. D. (1994). How time flies: age, memory, and temporal compression. Sociological Quarterly, 35, 705–721.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, H. W. (1978). A theoretical reconciliation of competing views of time perception. American Journal of Psychology, 91, 417–428.Google Scholar
Huxley, A. (1954). The doors of perception. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ichheiser, G. (1970). Appearances and realities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, vol. 1. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. (1946). Dialogue with death: the journal of a prisoner of the fascists in the Spanish Civil War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levine, L. (1999). Chic to chic. InStyle, February, 229.Google Scholar
Lowitt, B. (1994). Reggie! Reggie! St. Petersburg Times, Thursday, June 2, 1C.Google Scholar
Malkin, E. (2015). Ready to travel the world together. New York Times, Sunday, February 15, 22.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1968). The magic mountain. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menaghan, E. G. (1995). Social psychology: interpreting the data. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 321–325.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. P. (1920). Primitive time-reckoning. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ornstein, R. E. (1969). On the experience of time. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers. Vol. 1: the problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A., & Merton, R. K. (1937). Social time: a methodological and functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 42, 615–629.Google Scholar
Times Wires (2011). Harmless toss, tragic result. St. Petersburg Times, Saturday, July 9, 1C, 5C.Google Scholar
Ward, G. C. (1996). The west: an illustrated history. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. B. (1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittmann, M., Otten, S., Schötz, E., Sarikaya, A., Lehnen, H., Jo, H., Kohls, N., Schmidt, S., & Meissner, K. (2015). Subjective expansion of extended time-spans in experienced meditators. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. Jr. (1962). Some methodological problems of field studies. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 566–576.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden rhythms: schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (1982). The standardization of time: a sociohistorical perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1–23.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (1985). The seven day circle: the history and meaning of the week. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar