Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:31:02.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Chilton and Monika Kopytowska (Eds.), Religion, Language, and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. Iii+483. ISBN 978-0-19-063664-7 (Hb)

Review products

Paul Chilton and Monika Kopytowska (Eds.), Religion, Language, and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. Iii+483. ISBN 978-0-19-063664-7 (Hb)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

TERRY MCDONOUGH
TERRY MCDONOUGH*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 720 - 727
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Boeve, L. & Feyaerts, K., (1999). Religious metaphors in a postmodern culture: transverse links between apophatical theology and cognitive semantics. In Bove, L. & Feyaerts, K. (eds.), Metaphor and God-talk (pp. 152–184). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2016). Fire metaphors discourses of awe and authority. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2014). Language, space and mind: the conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1965). Linguistics, language and religion. London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
Downes, W. (2011). Language and religion: a journey into the human mind. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, B. & Green, J. B. (eds.) (2014). Cognitive linguistic explorations in biblical studies. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, D. & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111(1), 138–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: the divided brain and the making of the western world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, P. (2009). The neuroscience of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejazz Group (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol , 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D., (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1986.)Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false beliefs: a shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(34), 8491–8498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Noppen, J. P. (ed.) (1981). Theolinguistics. Brussels: Studiereeks Tijdschrift Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar