Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T19:05:20.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manuela Romano and M. Dolores Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in social and cognitive interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2016. Pp. 299. ISBN 978-9-027-26722-1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

MARÍA MUELAS-GIL
MARÍA MUELAS-GIL*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 186 - 192
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

references

Bamberg, Michael (1985). Form and function in the construction of narratives: developmental perspectives. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Brandt, Line, & Brandt, Per Aage (2005). Making sense of a blend: a cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Giles, & Turner, Mark (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna (2007). Text world theory: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph E., Oakley, Todd, & Coulson, Seana (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Steen, G. & Gibbs, R. (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In Huston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff (Eds.), Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 176–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Turner, Mark (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., & White, Peter R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd, & Hougaard, Anders (Eds.) (2008). Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela, & Porto, M. Dolores (2010). Attentional markers in the structure of oral narratives of charged events. In Caballero, Rosario & Jesús Pinar, M. (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 729–736). Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela, Porto, M. Dolores, & Molina, Clara (2013). The structure of emotion discourse: from Labovian to Socio-Cognitive Models. Text and Talk, 33(1), 71–93.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2010). Para além do pensamento abyssal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes [Beyond abyssal thinking: from global lines to an ecology of forms of knowledge]. In Santos, Boaventura de Sousa & Meneses, Maria Paula (Eds.), Epistemologias do Sul (pp. 23–71). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stephan Th. (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul (1999). Text worlds: representing conceptual space in discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jorg, Hellsten, Ilina, & Nerlich, Brigitte (2008). Discourse metaphors. In Dirven, René, Frank, Roselyn, & Bernardez, Enrique (Eds.) Body, language, and mind: sociocultural situatedness, Vol. 2 (pp. 363–383). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar