Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Jameson, Anthony
1996.
Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues.
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
193.
Ayton, Peter
and
Hardman, David K.
1997.
Safer Systems.
p.
136.
Fox, Craig R.
and
Irwin, Julie R.
1998.
The Role of Context in the Communication of Uncertain Beliefs.
Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
57.
Krause, Paul
Fox, John
Judson, Philip
and
Patel, Mukesh
1998.
Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms.
Vol. 1455,
Issue. ,
p.
138.
González-Vallejo, Claudia
Sorum, Paul C.
Stewart, Thomas R.
Chessare, John B.
and
Mumpower, Jeryl L.
1998.
Physicians' Diagnostic Judgments and Treatment Decisions for Acute Otitis Media in Children.
Medical Decision Making,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Moxey, Linda M.
and
Sanford, Anthony J.
2000.
Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
237.
De Bruin, S.
2000.
Querying probabilistic land cover data using fuzzy set theory.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
359.
Lipkus, Isaac M.
Samsa, Greg
and
Rimer, Barbara K.
2001.
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples.
Medical Decision Making,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Lipkus, Isaac M.
Biradavolu, Monica
Fenn, Kathryn
Keller, Punam
and
Rimer, Barbara K.
2001.
Informing Women About Their Breast Cancer Risks: Truth and Consequences.
Health Communication,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
205.
Bier, V.M
2001.
On the state of the art: risk communication to the public.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 2,
p.
139.
Finger, Richard
and
Bisantz, Ann M.
2002.
Utilizing graphical formats to convey uncertainty in a decision-making task.
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Bruine de Bruin, Wändi
Fischbeck, Paul S.
Stiber, Neil A.
and
Fischhoff, Baruch
2002.
What Number is “Fifty‐Fifty”?: Redistributing Excessive 50% Responses in Elicited Probabilities.
Risk Analysis,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
713.
Witteman, Cilia
and
Renooij, Silja
2003.
Evaluation of a verbal–numerical probability scale.
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
117.
Bartoshuk, L.M
Duffy, V.B
Fast, K
Green, B.G
Prutkin, J
and
Snyder, D.J
2003.
Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste.
Food Quality and Preference,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
125.
Bier, Vicki M.
Ferson, Scott
Haimes, Yacov Y.
Lambert, James H.
and
Small, Mitchell J.
2003.
Risk Analysis and Society.
p.
74.
Budescu, David V.
Karelitz, Tzur M.
and
Wallsten, Thomas S.
2003.
Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
159.
Basapur, Santosh
Bisantz, Ann M.
and
Kesavadas, T.
2003.
The Effect of Display Modality on Decision-Making with Uncertainty.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
558.
Christopher, Mary M.
and
Hotz, Christine S.
2004.
Cytologic diagnosis: expression of probability by clinical pathologists.
Veterinary Clinical Pathology,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
84.
Bartoshuk, Linda
Fast, Katharine
Snyder, Derek
and
Duffy, Valerie
2004.
Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity.
Böckenholt, Ulf
2004.
Comparative Judgments as an Alternative to Ratings: Identifying the Scale Origin..
Psychological Methods,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 4,
p.
453.